
Foley's List presents the 'Think Foley's' podcast dedicated to providing informative and convenient on-the-go Continuing Professional Development (CPD) listening for legal professionals.
| Publishes | Twice weekly | Episodes | 156 | Founded | 6 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | EducationBusiness | |||

Hosted by Foley's barrister David Kim, this series brings together leading minds in the field of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to share their experiences and knowledge with us on all things ADR, including mediation and arbitration. In this deb... more
In this episode, Foley's barristers Glen Pauline and Duncan Willis discuss the cases of Leon Cycle Pty Ltd v Hi5 Scooters Pty Ltd and LCA Traralgon v Ashlee Johnson.
They look at how these two cases played out, and lessons learned for those draftin... more
In this episode, Foley's List barristers Rohan Hoult and Amy Yu alongside Daniel Myers, Partner at Schetzer Papaleo Lawyers explore the challenges of dealing with stress and anxiety in legal practice. They discuss practical strategies for managing pr... more
This episode is a recording of the online CPD from 19 March 2026, presented by Foley's barristers Neill Hutton SC, Paul Kounnas and Alice Cooney.
This practical session is designed to equip Solicitors with valuable insight into identifying applicat... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





Just listened to the latest episode about careers with VWL. Amazing insights!
I had high hopes for this podcast series. The members of the bar are, not surprisingly, often excellent presenters. But the intro for the shows with a “voice artist” is tacky. Then the substantive content, which I was going would be conversational, is a barrister reading a piece of research. Well done to Foleys for putting out this series. Shame it wasn’t done better.
Great resource, well done for pioneering.
From Dhillon Legal
The easiest and fastest way to earn complimentary CPD points for solicitors from all practice areas. Well done Foley’s for pioneering and providing a valuable legal resource.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.









Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
The series centers on practical, high-signal legal discourse across criminal, family, environmental, and corporate law, with frequent deep-dives into evidence rules, legislative changes, and real-world case implications. Episodes often feature senior barristers, judges, and leading practitioners discussing how laws evolve, how trials are argued, and how technological shifts (like AI) intersect with professional practice and court procedures. A standout pattern is the blend of traditional courtroom expertise with forward-looking topics, including AI in submissions, new committal processes, and multidisciplinary approaches to complex family disputes. This mix makes the show especially valuable for practitioners seeking CPD-worthy insights, pr... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Think Foley's. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Think Foley's and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Think Foley's, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Think Foley's, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Think Foley's has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Think Foley's:
1. CPD with Holmes List Barristers
2. Law Report
3. Conversations
4. The Imperfects
5. Chat 10 Looks 3
Think Foley's launched 6 years ago and published 156 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Think Foley's from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Think Foley's. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Think Foley's include:
1. Jack Anderson
2. Amy Yu
3. Annette Lakey
4. Sarah Fisken
5. Radu Catrina
6. Judy Small AM
7. John Spender
8. Aaron M. Lane
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.