
Dr. Andrew Kinkella brings you stories about pseudo-archaeology and the real stories behind the false claims.
| Publishes | Twice monthly | Episodes | 196 | Founded | 12 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | Natural SciencesScienceHistory | |||

Half way between Joe Versus the Volcano and Tropic Thunder lies The Lost City. That is a good location. I suggest you go there with me!
Transcripts
For rough transcripts of this episode head over to www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/pseudo/... more
Did the Egyptians make it all the way to the Grand Canyon? Have I been engaged in a massive conspiracy to cover up secrets? Trust no one (except your common sense).
Links
The APN Awards: The APN Awards - Nominations Open!
Transcripts
For rough tr... more
As a child of the 80s, I have fond memories of the TV show “In Search Of…” It was chock full of Pseudoarchaeology silliness, but it was so much fun, and super creepy sometimes too! Plus you can never go wrong with 1970s Leonard Nimoy.
The APN Awards... more
The show “Curse of Oak Island” is now into its 13th season and still going strong(ish)! What’s the deal with this place? Why do they keep digging big holes there? Have they found anything? I’m afraid you already know the answers to all my questions. ... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





In regard to Episode 180, “Is Carbon 14 Dating Fake?”, I do not see the method as fake, it is the assumptions. How do we know that the decay rate is constant when Dr Willard Libby himself recognized that the atmosphere itself isn’t in equilibrium? To me, that seems like an inconsistency not to be ignored…
Way to ruin an interesting topic. I'm a skeptic and like listening to these kinds of podcasts to pick up some facts and talking points that I can use when discussing with. I listened to 3 episodes and got nothing. Nada. The host just talks about how stupid and idiotic the topics are. I'm not an expert, but I know that if I go in laughing at a person and calling their beliefs stupid and idiotic, that shuts down the conversation.You are not going to educate someone by mocking and laughing at them.... more
I stumbled across this podcast looking for something to bridge conversation over shared interests in the history of humans with someone who’s been sucked in by Hancock in part because of the colonialist mindset of those who have historically dominated archaeology. But the 2025 host painfully pompous in exactly that way (the earlier hosts were far better but terrible sound quality).
My hope is that he’s intending to mirror Hancock et al and somehow his condescension is effective with a large po... more
Don’t listen to this podcast. Came for the cenotes episode, left after hearing his personal views on transgender people guised behind reductionist science. Byeeeeee loser lol
As a skeptic myself, he’s embarrassing to listen to.
Unless you want to hear from someone who thinks they are way smarter than they actually are, I would check out a different show.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.










Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | Gender Skew | Location | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interests | Professions | Age Range | |||
| Household Income | Social Media Reach | ||||
A rigorous, evidence-focused show that debunks pseudoscience and pseudo-archaeology while exploring real archaeological methods and history. Episodes frequently dissect sensational claims, explain dating techniques, and highlight how scientific reasoning and ethical practice shape public understanding. Listeners can expect accessible explanations, fieldwork anecdotes, and thoughtful critique of sensational narratives, making complex topics approachable for both practitioners and curious non-experts. The host often blends practical archaeology, media critiques, and outreach to broaden public engagement with science-based archaeology. The show stands out for its clear commitment to 'facts first' and for bringing scholarly rigor to popularly m... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Pseudo-Archaeology. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Pseudo-Archaeology and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Pseudo-Archaeology, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Pseudo-Archaeology, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Pseudo-Archaeology has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Pseudo-Archaeology:
1. MonsterTalk
2. Historical Blindness
3. The Common Descent Podcast
4. Skeptoid
5. Myths and Legends
Pseudo-Archaeology launched 12 years ago and published 196 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Pseudo-Archaeology from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Pseudo-Archaeology. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Pseudo-Archaeology include:
1. Dan Farah
2. Jeremiah Johnston
3. Joseph Assetta
4. Seth Andrews
5. Craig Signorelli
6. Flint Dibble
7. Graham Hancock
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.