Rephonic
Artwork for Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

scotusstats.com
U.S. Supreme Court
Chevron Deference
Congress
Statutory Interpretation
Campos-Chaves V. Garland
Moab Partners, L.P.
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp.
Administrative Law
Executive Agencies
Rule 10b-5
Purdue Pharma
Moore V. United States
Testimonial Statements
Smith V. Arizona
Item 303
Judicial Power
Legal Authority
Ninth Circuit
SEC
Private Right Of Action

A podcast feed of the audio recordings of the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. * Podcast adds new arguments automatically and immediately after they become available on supremecourt.gov * Detailed episode descriptions with facts about the case from oyez.org and links to docket and other information. * Convenient chapters to skip to any exchange between a justice and an advocate (availab... more

PublishesDailyEpisodes464Founded2 years ago
Number of ListenersCategories
GovernmentPoliticsNews

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Petitioner: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC.

Respondent: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund.

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

M&K Emplo... more

Wolford v. Lopez

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Petitioner: Jason Wolford.

Respondent: Anne E. Lopez, Attorney General of Hawaii.

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

In 2023, Hawaii and California enacted new laws, Act 52 and Senate Bill 2, respecti... more

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Jan 14, 2026.

Petitioner: Cedric Galette.

Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.

Advocates:

* Michael Zuckerman (for New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. (Respondent... more

Little v. Hecox

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Jan 13, 2026.

Petitioner: Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al.

Respondent: Lindsay Hecox, et al.

Advocates:

* Alan M. Hurst (for the Petitioners)

* Hashim M. Mooppan (for the Uni... more

Key Facts

Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Divided Argument
Divided ArgumentWill Baude, Dan Epps
Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch
We the People
We the PeopleNational Constitution Center
Amarica's Constitution
Amarica's ConstitutionAkhil Reed Amar

Recent Guests

Mr. Cargill
Defendant in the case advocating against the interpretation of bump stocks as machine guns
Episode: [22-976] Garland v. Cargill
Solicitor General
Represents the government in defending the ban on bump stocks
Episode: [22-976] Garland v. Cargill

Host

Justices of the Supreme Court
The show features various Associate Justices and the Chief Justice, who provide oral arguments during Supreme Court cases.

Reviews

4.9 out of 5 stars from 65 ratings
  • A deep dive into Article III

    The federal judiciary is an undervalued subject in public school civics courses. This is a good place to learn more about Article III of the U.S. Constitution and its activities. The Supreme Court is the institution that settles constitutional controversies (the cases fortunate enough to make it this far). Listening to the Justices’ questions and the lawyers’ arguments, one will gain insight into the mind of the Court and the complexities with which it is regularly subjected. Far from boring, SC... more

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Gregorius_Maximus
    United Statesa month ago
  • Best SCOTUS Arg Podcast

    There are many podcasts of Supreme Court arguments, this one is the fastest to upload (same day) and provides the most helpful links in the episode notes (docket, scotusblog, etc.). Thank you.

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    JJ_00000
    United States10 months ago
  • Finally Found this

    I enjoy listening to the Supreme Court arguments. I’ve been streaming them for ages on CSPAN, PBS etc without realising there was a designated podcast. Perfect

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    harstoft
    United Kingdom10 months ago
  • Thanks

    No longer need to download OA’s from SCOTUS.gov

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Reg884603
    United States10 months ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Listeners find this resource invaluable for understanding complex legal issues through direct court arguments.
Many appreciate the immediate accessibility of episodes and related resources, enhancing their learning experience.
The inclusion of detailed case descriptions and educational links is frequently praised.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#15
United States/Government
Apple Podcasts
#108
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#152
United Kingdom/Government
Apple Podcasts
#65
Italy/Government
Apple Podcasts
#218
Australia/Government
Apple Podcasts
#250
France/Government

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

[24-813] Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
Q: So assuming that I think that of or relating to was just a mere conforming amendment and therefore we're still in the land of causal nexus but for nexus, I thought your client had a pretty good argument that you satisfied that.
You could say that this is the unusual case where even if you have a causal nexus test of some sort, we would still satisfy it...
[24-813] Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
Q: How would your argument differ if this were pre-2011?
My argument would be a lot tougher pre-2011 because obviously, before 2011, the statute would have said 'for', not 'for or related to.'
[25-332] Trump v. Slaughter
Q: In this case, in a multi-body agency such as the FTC, is there any permissible restriction?
No, the president's power to remove officers wielding the executive power is conclusive and preclusive.
[25-332] Trump v. Slaughter
Q: General Sauer, could you give me one example of a permissible restriction on the authority to remove a principal officer?
There are no permissible restrictions on principal officers who exercise the executive power; any review of arguably bad reasons for removal would be subject to the political process.
[24-872] Hamm v. Smith
Q: Is the test whether or not it is likely?
Yes, it's our understanding of the preponderance burden in Alabama.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About Supreme Court Oral Arguments

What is Supreme Court Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

This podcast offers a direct auditory experience of oral arguments presented before the United States Supreme Court, providing a unique insight into high-level legal discussions that shape American law. Each episode features the actual audio recordings of cases being argued, accompanied by detailed descriptions that include facts, context, and links to relevant legal resources, allowing listeners to engage deeply with the material. The incorporation of features such as chapter markers allows for easy navigation to specific exchanges between justices and advocates, enhancing the educational aspect for legal enthusiasts, lawyers, students, and anyone interested in the workings of the U.S. legal system.

Where can I find podcast stats for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does Supreme Court Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does Supreme Court Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

These podcasts share a similar audience with Supreme Court Oral Arguments:

1. Divided Argument
2. Advisory Opinions
3. We the People
4. Amarica's Constitution
5. The Dispatch Podcast

How many episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments are there?

Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 2 years ago and published 464 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Recent guests on Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:

1. Mr. Cargill
2. Solicitor General

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days