Rephonic
Artwork for Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

scotusstats.com
First Amendment
Congress
U.S. Supreme Court
Immigration and Nationality Act
Environmental Protection Agency
Ninth Circuit
Social Media Platforms
Constitutional Law
Due Process
ERISA
Fourth Amendment
Lackey V. Stinnie
Trump V. United States
Content Moderation
Due Process Clause
Connelly V. United States
Bankruptcy Code
Rule 704B
Texas
Judicial Review

A podcast feed of the audio recordings of the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. * Podcast adds new arguments automatically and immediately after they become available on supremecourt.gov * Detailed episode descriptions with facts about the case from oyez.org and links to docket and other information. * Convenient chapters to skip to any exchange between a justice and an advocate (availab... more

PublishesDailyEpisodes497Founded3 years ago
Number of ListenersCategories
GovernmentNewsPolitics

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office, Georgia

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Nov 2, 2026.

Petitioner: Jasmine Younge.

Respondent: Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office, Georgia .

Facts of the case (f... more

Maxwell v. Dinis

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Nov 2, 2026.

Petitioner: William Maxwell.

Respondent: Sandra Dinis, Acting Warden.

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

William Maxwell is a federal prisoner housed at FCI Beaumont Low in T... more

Oral argument for Salazar v. Paramount Global, argued on October 14, 2026.

YouTube

Beaird v. United States

Justia · Docket · oyez.org · YouTube

Argued on Oct 13, 2026.

Petitioner: Kendrick Jarrell Beaird.

Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

* Kevin Joel Page (for the Petitioner)

* Eric J. Feigin (for the ... more

Key Facts

Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch
Amarica's Constitution
Amarica's ConstitutionAkhil Reed Amar
We the People
We the PeopleNational Constitution Center
Bloomberg Law
Bloomberg LawBloomberg
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Recent Guests

Mr. Lau
Respondent, lawful permanent resident returning to the U.S.
Episode: [25-429] Blanche v. Lau
Ms. Blatt
Petitioner counsel referenced in the closing arguments
Episode: [25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
Mr. Cargill
Defendant in the case advocating against the interpretation of bump stocks as machine guns
Episode: [22-976] Garland v. Cargill
Solicitor General
Represents the government in defending the ban on bump stocks
Episode: [22-976] Garland v. Cargill

Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars from 111 ratings
  • Best way to listen to SCOTUS

    This podcast uploads SCOTUS oral arguments fast

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    mj_tomp
    United States7 months ago
  • A deep dive into Article III

    The federal judiciary is an undervalued subject in public school civics courses. This is a good place to learn more about Article III of the U.S. Constitution and its activities. The Supreme Court is the institution that settles constitutional controversies (the cases fortunate enough to make it this far). Listening to the Justices’ questions and the lawyers’ arguments, one will gain insight into the mind of the Court and the complexities with which it is regularly subjected. Far from boring, SC... more

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Gregorius_Maximus
    United States10 months ago
  • Best SCOTUS Arg Podcast

    There are many podcasts of Supreme Court arguments, this one is the fastest to upload (same day) and provides the most helpful links in the episode notes (docket, scotusblog, etc.). Thank you.

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    JJ_00000
    United States2 years ago
  • Finally Found this

    I enjoy listening to the Supreme Court arguments. I’ve been streaming them for ages on CSPAN, PBS etc without realising there was a designated podcast. Perfect

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    harstoft
    United Kingdom2 years ago
  • Thanks

    No longer need to download OA’s from SCOTUS.gov

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Reg884603
    United States2 years ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Clear, grounded explanations of complex legal issues.
Fast uploads with same-day SCOTUS arguments and notes.
Docket links and transcripts are consistently helpful.
Great for students and professionals following current cases.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#25
United States/Government
Apple Podcasts
#198
United Kingdom/Government
Apple Podcasts
#222
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#71
Italy/Government
Apple Podcasts
#191
Australia/Government
Apple Podcasts
#214
France/Government

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

[25-5343] Beaird v. United States
Q: How do you go about deciding what “large capacity magazine” means without deferring to the Sentencing Commission's commentary?
Page says courts should use the text and structure of the Guidelines. He suggests assessing what constitutes a large magazine in relation to semi-automatic firearms, while acknowledging that this approach could leave edge cases for courts to resolve.
[25-5343] Beaird v. United States
Q: Does Stinson v. United States still correctly state the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Kevin Joel Page argues for no binding deference, while Eric J. Feigin defends Stinson as clarified by Kaiser, and Anthony J. Dick argues the Commission has statutory authority to interpret its advisory Guidelines. The justices question how the competing approaches fit the Sentencing Reform Act, precedent, and the Guidelines' advisory status.
[25-459] Salazar v. Paramount Global
Q: Can you explain exactly how the consent would work in your opinion?
Hammack says providers can obtain consent when a consumer transaction begins, when someone watches a video, or before disclosure, provided consent comes before the information is disclosed.
[25-459] Salazar v. Paramount Global
Q: Wouldn't it be natural to think that goods or services from a videotaped service provider could be video-related services?
Hammack argues that Congress used distinct terms in the provider, personally identifiable information, and consumer definitions, indicating that each has a different scope.
[25-6] Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated
Q: Is proof of bad faith required for judicial estoppel to apply in this context?
Not necessarily; the Court should consider a holistic set of factors, including intent to adopt inconsistent positions, rather than requiring a finding of clear bad faith.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About Supreme Court Oral Arguments

What is Supreme Court Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

This program delivers audio recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments, paired with detailed episode notes that include case facts from widely used sources and direct docket links. Each episode often features structured exchanges between justices and advocates, with transcripts and relevant materials highlighted to help listeners follow complex legal questions in real time. It's likely to attract listeners who want timely, authoritative coverage of high-stakes litigation, from law students and legal professionals to policy researchers seeking clear, cited insights into the Court's reasoning and potential precedential impact. A notable strength is the combination of rapid access to arguments and well-curated supporting materials, which can m... more

Where can I find podcast stats for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does Supreme Court Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does Supreme Court Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

These podcasts share a similar audience with Supreme Court Oral Arguments:

1. Advisory Opinions
2. Amarica's Constitution
3. We the People
4. Bloomberg Law
5. Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

How many episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments are there?

Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 3 years ago and published 497 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Recent guests on Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:

1. Mr. Lau
2. Ms. Blatt
3. Mr. Cargill
4. Solicitor General

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days