Rephonic
Artwork for Amarica's Constitution

Amarica's Constitution

Akhil Reed Amar
Donald Trump
14th Amendment
Birthright Citizenship
Supreme Court
Constitutional Law
Constitution
Insurrection
First Amendment
Congress
Trump Versus Anderson
Impeachment
Originalism
Presidential Immunity
Federalist Society
Executive Power
Abraham Lincoln
Trump Administration
Section Three Of the 14th Amendment
American Citizenship
Biden Administration

Professor Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University and one of the nation's leading authorities on the Constitution, offers weekly in-depth discussions on the most urgent and fascinating constitutional issues of our day. He is joined by co-host Andy Lipka and guests drawn from other top experts including Bob Woodward, Nina Totenberg, Neal Katyal, Lawrence ... more

PublishesWeeklyEpisodes300Founded6 years ago
Number of ListenersCategories
PoliticsHistoryNews

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for Amarica's Constitution

Latest Episodes

At the James Otis Lecture at Faneuil Hall in Boston, Professor Amar sat on a panel with (retired) Justice Stephen Breyer, Sarah Isgur, and the moderator, Chris Duggan.  Remarkably, the Justice and the Professor engaged in a debate on a case Justice B... more

This episode features Judge Patrick Schiltz, a deeply respected and honored judge on the US District Court in Minneapolis, interviewed by Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, long time friend of this podcast and distinguished scholar.  Judge Schiltz has... more

The President has been throwing news organizations out of various places: the White House in general, including the Press Room, and Air Force One.  Can he do that?  Does it matter why he is doing it?  Has this come up before?  Is it a  constitutional... more

The Eighth Circuit is at it again, believe it or not.  Despite what appeared to be a clear directive from the Supreme Court to use the 2022 map in the upcoming federal election in Missouri, a panel of three judges from the circuit went in the other d... more

Key Facts

Accepts Guests
Accepts Sponsors
Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch
We the People
We the PeopleNational Constitution Center
Divided Argument
Divided ArgumentWill Baude & Dan Epps

Recent Guests

Linda Colleen Jurado
Princeton student
Princeton University
Episode: The Constitution Goes to Princeton
Steven Smith
Author of On Statesmanship, discussing his book in this episode
Episode: More Statesmanship, and State Constitutions - Special Guests Steven B. Smith and Vikram D. Amar
Vikram Amar
Professor of Law, UC Davis, recurring guest on Amarica's Constitution
UC Davis School of Law
Episode: More Statesmanship, and State Constitutions - Special Guests Steven B. Smith and Vikram D. Amar
Vik Amar
Daniel J. Dykstra, distinguished professor of law at the University of California at Davis
University of California, Davis
Episode: An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar
Steven Calabresi
Clayton J and Henry R. Barber Professor of Law at Northwestern
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Episode: Unitary Duality - Guests Steven Calabresi and Vikram Amar
Steve Calabresi
Clayton J and Henry R. Barber Professor of Law; frequent visiting professor
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; Yale Law School
Episode: Reverence and Radicalism: Remembering Gordon Wood
Jeffrey Rosen
Professor of Law at GW Law and former CEO of the National Constitution Center; creator of The Blessings of Liberty
George Washington University Law School; National Constitution Center
Episode: Rosen on Liberty; Gorsuch on Gorsuch - with Jeffrey Rosen and Justice Neil Gorsuch
Neil Gorsuch
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Episode: Rosen on Liberty; Gorsuch on Gorsuch - with Jeffrey Rosen and Justice Neil Gorsuch
Jeb Boesberg
Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Episode: Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall

Hosts

Akhil Amar
Professor of Law and Political Science; Yale University; co-host providing deep constitutional analysis and historical context
Andy Lipka
Co-host; anchors discussions with accessible, conversational engagement and practical framing

Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars from 618 ratings
  • Disappointing recently

    I feel like it has gone downhill. It often seems to wander, partially I suspect because Andy often chimes in and takes it on a tangent. Also, the self-congratulation and name dropping gets a little old.

    Apple Podcasts
    2
    asdfasdfghjkl
    United Statesa month ago
  • Everything is fine!

    Yes, “Lincoln’s Promise Kept” is the actual title of an episode produced in the term that gave us Callais and the Court’s intrusion into ongoing elections. Which should tell you everything you need to know about the show. It’s definitely weird that Karl Marx is now the most astute analyst of how this Court will rule, and more weird that the well-heeled hosts don’t talk about it. If you want to know what your betters are thinking about, this is the podcast for you - all the self-delusions of the ... more

    Apple Podcasts
    2
    gm84192
    United States4 months ago
  • Viewpoint below ground

    A professor, not a practicing lawyer, and it shows. Right result, wrong clause and a myopic view of the text that somehow only speaks to him. He’s got a novel approach and is for entertainment, not good legal theory. An Originalist shill at heart.

    Amar is a conservative apologist and, above all things, a ring kisser.

    He marches with the fascists but cries when they burn down the institutions.

    And he keeps bringing on that hack Sarah Isgur. Miss Isgur doesn’t digest legal opinions and she lac... more

    Apple Podcasts
    1
    lamby183
    United States6 months ago
  • The fucking world is falling apart. And you two act like we can have a polite conversation with Trump supporters. You are so much a part of the problem.

    Podcast Addict
    1
    gpkos2018
    7 months ago
  • Incisive but anachronistic

    This show has incisive commentary and their coverage of certain constitutional issues is fabulous (though I’m not a lawyer). However, it was this very material that made me realize that SCOTUS doesn’t act in good faith and therefore the commentary is outdated - they are laboring under the illusion that the constitution matters more to the majority on the Supreme Court than power or the pet agendas of the justices. Which is absurd, and which makes points of constitutional argument and nuance sim... more

    Apple Podcasts
    4
    Munners111
    United States8 months ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Guests consistently praised for expertise and engaging dialogue between hosts.
Some criticism centers on perceived political bias or heavy promotion of scholarly work.
Many appreciate the civility and rigor, noting the educational value for legal education and civic literacy.
Listeners value the clear, deep constitutional explanations that make complex topics accessible.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#187
United States/News/Politics
Apple Podcasts
#213
South Africa/News/Politics

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar
Q: What remedies might the court consider if South Carolina wins or if there is a circuit split?
Remedies discussed include leveling up (extending absentee access to more voters) or leveling down (removing benefits for all), with considerations of remand to state courts and the Purcell Principle affecting timing before elections.
An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar
Q: You say that the Supreme Court has never taken up a 26th Amendment case. Has it turned down invitations to take up such cases?
The guest explains uncertainty about cert in the circuit decisions and notes that cert petitions may or may not have been pursued in the 5th or 7th Circuits; the Court has not recently granted review on the 26th Amendment in a straightforward way, leaving open the possibility of review if further splits and issues arise.
Unrehearsed Answers
Q: Why do states sometimes restrict how a governor fills a vacant Senate seat, and is it constitutional under the 17th Amendment to mandate party alignment or other qualifications for a temporary appointment?
Historically, states have varied rules for temporary appointments; debates center on federalism and the 17th Amendment's framework, with some expert commentary suggesting the legislature could set hiring conditions while preserving the general structure of appointment powers.
Unrehearsed Answers
Q: Would simultaneously serving as U.S. Senator and Representative violate the Constitution given the Ineligibility Clause and the idea of multiple offices?
There is an implicit prohibition against holding multiple offices in the same time frame; historical and scholarly analyses (e.g., One Person, One Office) suggest limits on simultaneous offices, though there are examples of overlapping roles in other eras; the hosts ultimately treat it as a challenging scenario likely yielding no, you cannot do it.
Unrehearsed Answers
Q: Two questions regarding President Trump's 1776 Weaponization Fund: assuming the appropriation could support the use of settlement money, would there be an appropriation clause or non-delegation problem? How might standing be established for challenging this use of funds?
The discussion frames the issue through constitutional and prerogative writs lenses, suggesting that remedies could exist if there is an improper use of funds or mismanagement; standing could potentially be argued by shareholders or other parties with fiduciary concerns, depending on the specifics of the funding and governance structures.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About Amarica's Constitution

What is Amarica's Constitution about and what kind of topics does it cover?

A weekly deep-dive into constitutional law and history, led by a Yale law professor and a congenial co-host, with guests drawn from top legal scholars, judges, and public intellectuals. Conversations cover the text, history, and doctrine shaping the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, and the evolving boundaries between executive power, legislative prerogatives, and civil rights. The format blends rigorous legal analysis with accessible storytelling, highlighting historical contexts, major theories (notably originalism), and contemporary political implications. Noteworthy is the eclectic slate of guests and the willingness to connect canonical cases to current events, making the material both educational for lawyers and engaging for... more

Where can I find podcast stats for Amarica's Constitution?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Amarica's Constitution. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Amarica's Constitution and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does Amarica's Constitution get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Amarica's Constitution, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for Amarica's Constitution?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Amarica's Constitution, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does Amarica's Constitution have?

To see how many followers or subscribers Amarica's Constitution has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to Amarica's Constitution?

These podcasts share a similar audience with Amarica's Constitution:

1. Advisory Opinions
2. We the People
3. Divided Argument
4. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
5. Conversations with Bill Kristol

How many episodes of Amarica's Constitution are there?

Amarica's Constitution launched 6 years ago and published 300 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact Amarica's Constitution?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for Amarica's Constitution?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Amarica's Constitution from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for Amarica's Constitution?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Amarica's Constitution. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on Amarica's Constitution?

Recent guests on Amarica's Constitution include:

1. Linda Colleen Jurado
2. Steven Smith
3. Vikram Amar
4. Vik Amar
5. Steven Calabresi
6. Steve Calabresi
7. Jeffrey Rosen
8. Neil Gorsuch

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days