
A weekly show from the National Constitution Center hosted by Julie Silverbrook and Tom Donnelly where listeners can hear the best arguments on all sides of the constitutional issues at the center of American life.
| Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 624 | Founded | 21 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | NewsNews CommentaryHistory | |||

The National Constitution Center recently published The Promise of America: Reflections on Our Enduring Ideals (Simon & Schuster), a keepsake collection of essays bringing together leading thinkers from across perspectives to reflect on the ideals at... more
In this episode, Michael Auslin joins to discuss his new book, National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America, a sweeping and vivid history of the Declaration of Independence from its drafting to its enduring role in American lif... more
In this episode, Jonathan Adler of William & Mary Law School and Stephen Vladeck of Georgetown University Law Center explore a part of the Supreme Court’s work that has drawn growing public attention: its emergency, or “shadow,” docket. Julie Silverb... more
On April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisiana congressional map, holding that racial considerations cannot predominate in the drawing of electoral districts. The ruling narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights A... more
People also subscribe to these shows.




What happened to this podcast? Please return to primarily debating Supreme Court arguments and opinions with an occasional historical show.
Jeff used to host regular, weekly debates on current constitutional questions between reputable scholars who engaged with ideas, not ideology.
These days it seems to be a weekly history lesson with occasional focused debate over an immediate issue.
I feel they are trying to avoid controversy and neglecting their mission.
This used to be one of my favorite podcasts, but since early 2025 they’ve shied away from discussing the actual merits of arguments being made. This is doubly true for issues that the current administration has strong feelings about. I’m not saying they’re partisan, but you can tell they’re playing it safe since they’re “chartered by congress”. It’s sad to see. I really appreciated hearing opposing opinions for the most hotly debated issues. There’s tons of podcasts out there that cover historic... more
This is the most persistently disappointing podcast I know of. The topics are consistently interesting, and I'm always eager to learn more about them. The discussions seem like a boring overly officious polite class, rather than engaging and provocative. Maybe it's so eager to be non-partisan that it's pablum. It's certainly notable today that as we go through huge changes, I don't hear any meaningful challenge, nor do I gain an appreciation of other views. Rome crumbles and I hear blah bl... more
I am a long time listener because of Jeffrey Rosen. His knowledge and love for our country and his mastering of our constitution and how this country evolved the way it has makes him the primary reason for people to come to this podcast and learn. I’m afraid I won’t be listening anymore.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #95 | |
Apple Podcasts | #227 | |
Apple Podcasts | #188 | |
Apple Podcasts | #192 | |
Apple Podcasts | #218 | |
Apple Podcasts | #10 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
A weekly, civics-forward discussion featuring scholars, legal experts, and historians who unpack constitutional issues and American civic life. Episodes typically center on Supreme Court dynamics, voting rights, historic documents, and the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, often weighing historical context against contemporary policy questions. A notable strength is bringing rigorous legal analysis to broad audiences, with guests ranging from law professors to historians and political thinkers, creating a steady stream of thoughtful, policy-relevant conversations. Listeners may appreciate in-depth debates, historical perspectives, and accessible explanations of complex legal questions, though some critiques mention a perceived bi... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for We the People. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to We the People and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for We the People, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for We the People, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers We the People has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with We the People:
1. Amarica's Constitution
2. Divided Argument
3. Advisory Opinions
4. The Lawfare Podcast
5. U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
We the People launched 21 years ago and published 624 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for We the People from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of We the People. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on We the People include:
1. Michael Auslin
2. Jonathan Adler
3. Stephen Vladeck
4. Edward Foley
5. Michael Morley
6. Robert Williams
7. Nicholas Cole
8. Mary Beth Norton
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.