Advisory Opinions is a legal podcast by The Dispatch. Hosts David French and Sarah Isgur meet twice a week to talk about the law, the courts, their collision with politics, and why it all matters.
Publishes | Twice weekly | Episodes | 535 | Founded | 5 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Listeners | Categories | GovernmentNewsPolitics |
David French returns from his other job to discuss President Trump’s transgender military policy with Sarah Isgur. Does the Supreme Court hate transgender people? (Hint: No.)
The Agenda:
—Transgender military policy reflects ongoing debates about au... more
The Advisory Opinions extended universe kicks off as SCOTUSblog's Amy Howe and David Lat join Sarah Isgur to discuss the St. Isidore of Seville religious charter school case and the debate over school choice.
The Agenda:
—A ‘public’ public school or... more
Sarah Isgur and David French explain the upcoming Supreme Court decision regarding the public chartering of religious schools and how it might implicate the establishment clause.
The Agenda:
—Justice Gorsuch is the new Justice Kennedy
—More on SCOTU... more
Sarah Isgur and David French are joined by Amy Howe and David Lat, of The Dispatch’s extended legal universe, to debate whether the Supreme Court should be more transparent.
Sarah and David then separate fact from the fiction in the arrest of Judge... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
AO is indispensable for anyone who wants to actually understand the reasoning behind court decisions. Coverage in newspapers and TV does the public a disservice by portraying everything in partisan terms, or “good guys vs. bad guys”. David and Sarah, OTOH, explain how courts applied the law and the Constitution in reaching a decision. Unlike most reporting, they will explain why the reasoning in a decision is correct when they personally disagree with the policy outcome, and may question the log... more
The only reason I listen to this podcast is because I respect David French so much, but Sarah has become so insufferable since this new administration that I don’t think I can listen much longer. The latest episode on “The collision is coming” was the first time David actually pushed back on Sarah’s nonsense. The fact that he hasn’t been doing that more makes me sometimes wonder if the David French of the NYT is different from the David French of this podcast. The problem with Sarah is that she ... more
Today I got out of NYT Spelling Bee with “dicta”
I just listened to the Rights of Detainees podcast. The discussion was all over the place. I’m an attorney and had difficulty tracking it. Laura appeared to workshopping her analysis during the podcast. Lots of spewing of ideas/possibilities. Please do that before recording!
Also — distinguish between the court decisions and say what they have in common and how they differ and how that relates to your analysis.
In such critical times of chaos and human rights abuses, we need clarity. Please... more
Came here to say, David how can you stay on a pod with this woman who doesn’t even tell the truth any more???? Then I read my previous review. You know…when it’s time to go
_________
Has become a Sarah vanity project. David, please leave this…
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #67 | |
Apple Podcasts | #180 | |
Apple Podcasts | #21 | |
Apple Podcasts | #55 | |
Apple Podcasts | #99 | |
Apple Podcasts | #153 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Listeners per Episode | |
---|---|
Gender Skew | |
Location | |
Interests | |
Professions | |
Age Range | |
Household Income | |
Social Media Reach |
A legal podcast that engages listeners with in-depth discussions on pertinent legal matters, including Supreme Court cases, judicial procedures, and the intersection of law and politics. The hosts frequently analyze recent court decisions, exploring topics such as parental rights, executive power, and the role of special counsels. Unique to this podcast is its ability to blend legal analysis with historical context, providing insights that are both academic and accessible to a general audience. The hosts strive to yield balanced commentary while inviting guests tasked with analyzing contemporary legal issues, creating a comprehensive platform for understanding today’s most pressing legal challenges.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Advisory Opinions. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Advisory Opinions and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Advisory Opinions, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Advisory Opinions, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Advisory Opinions has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Advisory Opinions:
1. The Dispatch Podcast
2. The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
3. GLoP Culture
4. How The World Works
5. The Editors
Advisory Opinions launched 5 years ago and published 535 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Advisory Opinions from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Advisory Opinions. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Advisory Opinions include:
1. Amy Howe
2. Amul Thapar
3. Gregg Costa
4. Judge David Straus
5. Rod Rosenstein
6. Rob Hur
7. Judge Cheryl Ann Krause
8. Stacey Schiff
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.