
Advisory Opinions is a legal podcast by The Dispatch. Hosts David French and Sarah Isgur meet twice a week to talk about the law, the courts, their collision with politics, and why it all matters.
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 630 | Founded | 6 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | PoliticsNewsGovernment | |||

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss President Donald Trump’s rhetoric over Iran, what constitutes a war crime, and what happens if a military officer fails to obey an order or regulation.
The Agenda:
–John Mulaney gives SCOTUSblog a shoutout
–Threa... more
Pam Bondi is no longer attorney general, Steve Bannon’s case is sent back to lower courts, and the Chiles decision on conversion therapy becomes nonpartisan.
The Agenda:
—Pam Bondi’s disastrous tenure
—Three Year Letterman shoutout
—SCOTUS kicks Stev... more
Sarah Isgur is joined by David French, Amanda Tyler, Akhil Amar, and SCOTUSblog’s Amy Howe to react to the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara, Donald Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship.
Watch the livestream here.
Learn more about your ad ch... more
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie joins Sarah Isgur and David French to discuss his explicit argument with the former FBI Director Robert Mueller, remember a Christmas carol session with former Attorney General John Ashcroft, and weigh in on whet... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





I don’t mind ads in podcasts, as long as they are not obnoxious. Ads that are louder than the content is one way that ads can be obnoxious, and that is the case with this podcast. The content here deserves a higher rating, but I will not listen to this podcast because the ads are too loud relative to the level of the content.
I realize this podcast has morphed into a phase of being by law nerds for law nerds, but i really miss the days when Sara and David would explain core things again from time to time. I do not understand major questions doctrine or SCOTUS considering things on the merits versus cert. The hosts will often say that the audience knows all about those things, but here I am. And it’s not easy to go back and find an episode where it’s explained to refresh yourself. I do love the podcast but I find it w... more
I tried to listen but one episode reminded me how virulently hateful and not very bright Isgur is. And French is just blah.
I am a physician, not a lawyer. And I am more progressive than the hosts. I first heard Sara on Left Right and Center, and followed her here. This is now my favorite legal podcast because I don’t always agree, but I always learn something. They break down cases with facts and analysis, and usually paint a pretty full picture even when it doesn’t necessarily go their way. They also admit their biases and when they are going results first and reasoning second. Kinda how you hope the law would work... more
I am really starting to question David French’s judgment. First he writes a despicable hit piece on Israel, accusing Israel of starving Palestinians. Then here recently he writes an op ed praising James Talarico. The same James Talarico who twists Christianity to appear to support his progressive politics and who outright lied about his appearance on the Colbert Show being canceled or banned. Do better, Mr. French.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #62 | |
Apple Podcasts | #166 | |
Apple Podcasts | #186 | |
Apple Podcasts | #244 | |
Apple Podcasts | #138 | |
Apple Podcasts | #80 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
The content features in-depth discussions on legal topics, particularly the workings of the U.S. Supreme Court and significant court rulings that intersect with broader political issues. Episodes frequently analyze key legal concepts such as immunity, executive power, and judicial appointments, with hosts dissecting recent cases while placing them within the context of societal implications and institutional trust. Additionally, the podcast addresses evolving legal philosophies, public perceptions of the judiciary, and the complexities of current events that shape legal understanding, offering insights that can appeal to both legal professionals and general audiences interested in politics and law.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Advisory Opinions. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Advisory Opinions and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Advisory Opinions, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Advisory Opinions, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Advisory Opinions has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Advisory Opinions:
1. The Dispatch Podcast
2. The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
3. Divided Argument
4. GLoP Culture
5. The Editors
Advisory Opinions launched 6 years ago and published 630 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Advisory Opinions from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Advisory Opinions. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Advisory Opinions include:
1. Amanda Tyler
2. Akhil Amar
3. Cecilia Wong
4. Chris Christie
5. Rebecca Taibleson
6. Stefanos Bibas
7. Adrian Vermeule
8. Lisa Blatt
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.