
An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps. In partnership with SCOTUSblog.
| Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 134 | Founded | 5 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | GovernmentPoliticsNews | |||

We picked two immigration decisions from the same day over the transgender-sports case because — Dan’s protests notwithstanding — that’s where the interesting law is. In Mullin v. Doe the Court lets the administration terminate temporary protected st... more
After a quick check on the Nina Totenberg embargo kerfuffle and one more revelation from Justice Thomas's memoir, we devote the episode to Chatrie v. United States, the Court's first major Fourth Amendment decision in years. We trace how the geofence... more
It's the last opinion day of the term, and the big one landed: Trump v. Barbara, the birthright-citizenship case. We read the majority as the rare easy case and spend most of the episode on why the four dissents each end up somewhere different — and ... more
The big opinions are coming fast and furious as the Term ends. This episode, we take on two related cases from the penultimate opinion drop day: Trump v. Slaughter, which overrules Humphrey's Executor and clears away for-cause protection for the inde... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





I very much respect your perspectives and I generally enjoy the episodes, but perhaps there is a blind spot you are not seeing. Both of you consistently, in episode after episode, dismiss Justice KBJ’s opinions. You both seem to almost revel in it. I am sure you will deny it but in a moment of honest self reflection, you might want to look
into that. It is my only sore point about the entire podcast.
I work for DOJ and listen to the show during my commute to and from work. It is my favorite podcast.
Long time listener, always enjoy the podcast as you stumble roughshod over general morals to explain where the court is coming from. But honestly.. you guys are clearly flush with cash given your career choices.. do we really need the ai generated covers for these episodes? They are always fitting, but equally devoid of life. Hire an artist.. although I suppose if trampling about to fit pieces into holes comes so naturally.. Who cares.
Even when I, as a non-lawyer, get lost when precedents are cited, I still appreciate the back and forth and microscopic and macroscopic analyses.
This is the best Supreme Court podcast.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #27 | |
Apple Podcasts | #161 | |
Apple Podcasts | #174 | |
Apple Podcasts | #127 | |
Apple Podcasts | #174 | |
Apple Podcasts | #237 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
This unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast features two law professors who dissect high-profile decisions and the broader doctrinal shifts they signal. Across episodes, deep dives into voting rights, shadow docket dynamics, procedural nuance, and the Court's approach to federalism and executive power are balanced with witty banter and lively debate. Notable for its long-form, argumentative style and willingness to reframe conventional narratives, it often pairs rigorous legal analysis with accessible commentary, guest experts, and occasional live audience energy. A strong selling point is the chemistry and clear, candid exchanges between the hosts, making complex constitutional questions approachable for legally literate listener... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Divided Argument. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Divided Argument and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Divided Argument, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Divided Argument, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Divided Argument has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Divided Argument:
1. Advisory Opinions
2. Amarica's Constitution
3. We the People
4. The Dispatch Podcast
5. Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Divided Argument launched 5 years ago and published 134 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Divided Argument from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Divided Argument. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Divided Argument include:
1. Pam Karlan
2. Justin Driver
3. Richard Primus
4. Steve Sachs
5. Rachel Barkow
6. Oren Kerr
7. Daryl Levinson
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.