
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 72 | Founded | 11 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Category | Government | |||

A case in which the Court will decide whether Executive Order No. 14,160 issued by President Donald, which denies U.S. birthright citizenship to children born in the United States solely because their parents are in the country unlawfully or on tempo... more
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably decided—under the standards set by federal habeas law—that Terry Pitchford gave up his right to argue that the prosecutor’s explanations for striking four Black ... more
A case in which the Court will decide whether venue is proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there.
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and stays a case pending arbitration maintains jurisdiction over a post-arbitration Section 9 or 10 application where jurisdiction would otherwise be ... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





Wondering why there are limited postings recently. So look forward to listening
The app is the most convenient way to listen to these arguments, but unlike in past years, whoever’s running this podcast isn’t updating it. Weeks and weeks go by and arguments still aren’t posted. It really disappointing, especially since the website itself is update timely.
I have loved this podcast as a way to listen to SCOTUS arguments. However, this year the uploads are so delayed and sporadic that I’ve been often listening to them via the SCOTUS website. It should be fairly straightforward to grab the audio & repost it here, so I wonder if they lost staff &/or funding to keep it up to date.
It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.
This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #33 | |
Apple Podcasts | #112 | |
Apple Podcasts | #79 | |
Apple Podcasts | #99 | |
Apple Podcasts | #117 | |
Apple Podcasts | #148 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
This program consistently delivers in-depth coverage of Supreme Court oral arguments, case dynamics, and how judicial reasoning unfolds across a range of landmark topics. Episodes commonly dissect statutory interpretation, constitutional rights, and the potential implications of rulings on public policy, often highlighting how justices approach complex questions and the practical effects on governance and society. A notable strength is the clear, educational framing that helps listeners understand the mechanics of the Court, though some episodes are criticized for delayed releases or repetitive audio issues which can affect the listening experience. Potential sponsors or guests may find value in a consistently engaged, policy-focused audien... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments:
1. Divided Argument
2. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
3. We the People
4. Amarica's Constitution
5. Advisory Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 11 years ago and published 72 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:
1. Mr. Fletcher
2. Mr. McCullough
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.