
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 72 | Founded | 10 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Category | Government | |||

A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether a rule requiring dismissal of repeat claims in state prisoner habeas petitions also applies to repeat claims in federal prisoner motions to vacate their sentences; and (2) whether it has jurisdiction ... more
A case in which the Court will decide whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
A case in which the Court will decide whether a claim that Postal Service employees intentionally refused to deliver mail to a designated address arises out of “the loss” or “miscarriage” of postal matter under the Federal Tort Claims Act’s postal-ma... more
A case in which the Court will decide whether federal candidates have Article III standing to challenge state election laws that extend the deadline for receiving and counting mail-in ballots beyond Election Day when they allege vote dilution and inc... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.
This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.
Thank you for what you do
Hard to keep up with the news. Sometimes arguments take days to weeks to show up in podcasts
The last available is from 5 weeks ago but there were arguments on Monday and Tuesday of this week- and the audio is available on the SCOTUS website- why is it not in the Oyez podcast?
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #21 | |
Apple Podcasts | #95 | |
Apple Podcasts | #198 | |
Apple Podcasts | #109 | |
Apple Podcasts | #152 | |
Apple Podcasts | #160 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
A unique platform that provides access to the oral arguments presented before the U.S. Supreme Court offers listeners an inside look into the judicial process. Focusing on various significant cases, it provides detailed discussions around legal principles, constitutional questions, and notable judicial interpretations. In addition to presenting actual case arguments, this resource serves to educate the audience about the complexities of law and its implications on society, covering diverse topics such as civil rights, education, healthcare, and environmental standards.
Listeners can expect thorough explorations of substantial legal matters, including intricate debates among justices and counsel. The focus on recent landmark cases ensures r... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments:
1. Divided Argument
2. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
3. We the People
4. Amarica's Constitution
5. Advisory Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 10 years ago and published 72 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:
1. Mr. Fletcher
2. Mr. McCullough
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.