Rephonic
Artwork for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court
Sovereign Immunity
Judicial Review
First Amendment
Section 1983
Environmental Protection Agency
Wilkinson V. Garland
Section 1014
Thompson V. United States
Bost V. Illinois State Board Of Elections
Eighth Amendment
Bufkin V. Mcdonough
Due Process
Voluntary Departure Statute
Medicaid
Benefit Of the Doubt Statute
RICO
Due Process Clause
Title VII
Smith V. Arizona
PublishesDailyEpisodes72Founded11 years ago
Number of ListenersCategory
Government

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

A case in which the Court will decide whether a prisoner’s claim based on a new constitutional rule counts as “previously unavailable”—which would allow the prisoner to file a second habeas petition—when the prisoner could have raised that claim in a... more

A case in which the Court will decide whether a defendant who files an answer without including an affirmative defense may still raise that defense as the basis for a summary judgment motion — without ever amending its answer — and whether that remai... more

A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal prisoner can use a habeas corpus petition to challenge the government's calculation of time credits earned under the First Step Act when seeking early transfer to a halfway house or home confine... more

A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refers to all of a video tape service provider’s goods or service... more

Key Facts

Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Divided Argument
Divided ArgumentWill Baude & Dan Epps
Strict Scrutiny
Strict ScrutinyStrict Scrutiny
Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch
Amarica's Constitution
Amarica's ConstitutionAkhil Reed Amar

Recent Guests

Kannon Shanmugam
Attorney for Suncor Energy and the other petitioners
Episode: Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
Miriam Harris
Attorney for the petitioners
Episode: Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
Philip Russell
Attorney for Boulder County
Episode: Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
Mr. Fletcher
Counsel representing the SEC during the argument.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Episode: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
Mr. McCullough
Counsel representing Jarkesy during the argument.
Episode: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy

Reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars from 710 ratings
  • Great But Missing Arguments

    Love being able to listen to arguments before SCOTUS. However, there are multiple arguments missing from the roster.

    Apple Podcasts
    3
    Mustard24
    United States6 months ago
  • Love it

    Wondering why there are limited postings recently. So look forward to listening

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Colorado cam
    United States7 months ago
  • Not updating

    The app is the most convenient way to listen to these arguments, but unlike in past years, whoever’s running this podcast isn’t updating it. Weeks and weeks go by and arguments still aren’t posted. It really disappointing, especially since the website itself is update timely.

    Apple Podcasts
    2
    corktown_313
    United States8 months ago
  • Too slow to update

    I have loved this podcast as a way to listen to SCOTUS arguments. However, this year the uploads are so delayed and sporadic that I’ve been often listening to them via the SCOTUS website. It should be fairly straightforward to grab the audio & repost it here, so I wonder if they lost staff &/or funding to keep it up to date.

    Apple Podcasts
    3
    Cheesefood4me
    United Statesa year ago
  • Untimely

    It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.

    Apple Podcasts
    1
    PuPower
    United States2 years ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Listeners value hearing the arguments directly and find the proceedings educational, revealing the complexity behind major cases.
The no-commentary format suits listeners who want primary-source access, though some pair it with separate analysis for context.
Some listeners report playback problems, including episodes restarting or repeating sections.
Delayed and inconsistent uploads are a recurring frustration for listeners who want timely access to recent arguments.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#31
United States/Government
Apple Podcasts
#86
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#223
United Kingdom/Government
Apple Podcasts
#61
Italy/Government
Apple Podcasts
#83
Australia/Government
Apple Podcasts
#14
South Korea/Government

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
Q: How do you determine whether a worker on an intrastate leg is engaged in interstate commerce?
Flowers argues that the worker must directly perform cross-border transportation work, while Brock argues that workers transporting goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify even without crossing state lines or interacting with a border-crossing vehicle.
Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
Q: What is the final destination for the product in this case?
Flowers' counsel says that the destination depends on the legal framework, while Brock's counsel identifies the retail stores as the intended destination because Flowers described distribution depots as temporary pauses and required Brock to deliver to the stores.
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
Q: Why do you want to be in federal court?
Enbridge says federal courts are better suited to address federal foreign-affairs issues, can review certain interlocutory decisions, and could avoid parallel state and federal proceedings.
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
Q: What do you see is the difference between the removal time limits and the statute of limitations?
The state argues that removal deadlines determine which of two courts will hear a case, while statutes of limitation restrict when claims may be brought and can close the courthouse entirely.
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
Q: If the Clean Air Act did not exist, would there be a federal common-law question to resolve in a case like this?
Harris says there would be a federal common-law question, although she does not concede that a federal court would necessarily recognize a cause of action. She argues the Clean Air Act displaced that role and that the remaining dispute should be analyzed under ordinary statutory preemption principles.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

What is U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

Unedited Supreme Court oral arguments offer a direct account of how the justices and advocates test legal claims in real time. Cases span constitutional law, immigration, criminal procedure, federal regulation, intellectual property, and the boundaries of court jurisdiction. Each episode centers on a specific dispute, with attorneys presenting competing interpretations of statutes and precedents while the justices probe their practical and legal consequences. The format is proceedings rather than commentary: listeners hear the questions, answers, rebuttals, and shifts in focus as they happen, without a regular host providing narration or explanation. That makes the recordings useful for lawyers, law students, researchers, and anyone interes... more

Where can I find podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

These podcasts share a similar audience with U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments:

1. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
2. Divided Argument
3. Strict Scrutiny
4. Advisory Opinions
5. Amarica's Constitution

How many episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments are there?

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 11 years ago and published 72 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Recent guests on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:

1. Kannon Shanmugam
2. Miriam Harris
3. Philip Russell
4. Mr. Fletcher
5. Mr. McCullough

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days