Rephonic
Artwork for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez
Wilkinson V. Garland
Smith V. Arizona
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bankruptcy
Campos-Chavez V. Garland
Testimonial Statements
Montgomery Benefits
Post-911 GI Bill
Board Of Immigration Appeals
U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act
Supreme Court
Due Process Clause
U.S. Supreme Court
2017 Act
United States Congress
Sheetz V. County Of El Dorado
Confrontation Clause
Forensic Evidence
Veterans Educational Benefits
Siegel
PublishesDailyEpisodes72Founded10 years ago
Category
Government

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

A case in which the Court held that federal district courts likely lack equitable authority under the Judiciary Act of 1789 to issue universal injunctions that prohibit enforcement of executive actions beyond the parties before the court.

A case in which the Court was asked to decide (1) whether a privately owned and operated school’s educational decisions are considered state action simply because the school has a contract with the state to provide free education to students, and (2)... more

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a federal court may certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury.

A case in which the Court will held that (1) the Supremacy Clause does not afford the United States a defense in a suit against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., and (2) the law enforcement proviso in §2680(h) of the FTC... more

Key Facts

Contact Information
Podcast Host

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Divided Argument
Divided ArgumentWill Baude, Dan Epps
We the People
We the PeopleNational Constitution Center
Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch
Amarica's Constitution
Amarica's ConstitutionAkhil Reed Amar
Bloomberg Law
Bloomberg LawBloomberg

Recent Guests

Mr. Fletcher
Counsel representing the SEC during the argument.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Episode: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
Mr. McCullough
Counsel representing Jarkesy during the argument.
Episode: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy

Reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars from 685 ratings
  • Untimely

    It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.

    Apple Podcasts
    1
    PuPower
    United Statesa year ago
  • A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

    This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    GCChaser
    United Statesa year ago
  • Simple podcast but exactly what i need

    Thank you for what you do

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    XheanortXIII
    United States2 years ago
  • Super delayed

    Hard to keep up with the news. Sometimes arguments take days to weeks to show up in podcasts

    Apple Podcasts
    1
    ballinb5
    United States2 years ago
  • I love to listen by why the delay in posting new arguments?

    The last available is from 5 weeks ago but there were arguments on Monday and Tuesday of this week- and the audio is available on the SCOTUS website- why is it not in the Oyez podcast?

    Apple Podcasts
    3
    Edna_9
    United States2 years ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Overall, feedback reflects a strong interest in the clarity and accessibility of legal content, underscoring its significance for a broader audience.
There are concerns about delays in episode releases, indicating a desire for more timely updates on critical arguments.
Listeners appreciate the educational value of breaking down complex Supreme Court cases.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#43
United States/Government
Apple Podcasts
#182
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#24
France/Government
Apple Podcasts
#69
Italy/Government
Apple Podcasts
#46
China/Government
Apple Podcasts
#49
South Korea/Government

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Q: What's your view of what would happen on remand?
If you agree with us that the case is moot, you could dismiss as improvidently granted or perhaps it would be vacater, and the petitioner could move for de-certification in the district court.
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Q: So if the May order was immaterially amended by the August order as the district order said in the Ninth Circuit found, can we still appeal the August order?
No, we cannot appeal the August order as it was not materially different from the May order, and the 14-day statute of limitations applies.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch
Q: What do we do with the IRS's prior position that suggested mootness motions should be filed if the tax liability has been fully paid?
IRS Chief Council notices are not binding, and the fact that they are adjusting their position does not change the legal framework.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch
Q: What is usually an issue in these suits, if not the underlying tax liability?
People are fighting about spousal defenses or installment plans instead of the underlying tax liability.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch
Q: Why wouldn't the tax court have jurisdiction?
The tax court wouldn't have jurisdiction when there's no longer a levy because the jurisdiction is very much tied to the levy.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

What is U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

The podcast offers listeners a unique opportunity to experience the oral arguments presented before the U.S. Supreme Court. Each episode features detailed discussions surrounding landmark cases, with the arguments often touching on crucial constitutional issues, judicial interpretations, and the implications of legal dilemmas. Episodes dissect specific cases based on current events, focusing on diverse topics ranging from civil rights to federal regulations, allowing listeners to grasp the complexities of the judicial process and its impact on society. The format uniquely blends education and immediacy, presenting the raw exchanges between justices and counsel, making it an accessible resource for those interested in law and governance.

Pa... more

Where can I find podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

These podcasts share a similar audience with U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments:

1. Divided Argument
2. We the People
3. Advisory Opinions
4. Amarica's Constitution
5. Bloomberg Law

How many episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments are there?

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments launched 10 years ago and published 72 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

Recent guests on U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments include:

1. Mr. Fletcher
2. Mr. McCullough

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days