
Our panelists answer audience-submitted questions that range from the serious to the ridiculous using as much science as they can muster! Hosts Jim, Derek, and a rotating panel use their expertise (or lack thereof) to tackle these questions in a manner that can only be described as "vaguely scientific."
| Publishes | Twice monthly | Episodes | 199 | Founded | 7 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | ComedyScience | |||

In this episode, Jim and Derek are joined by Mark and Spooky Dave to try and figure out how Freddy Krueger would kill us each individually. Then, why can't we kill slashers? It'd make our lives so much easier. And to round out our spooky episode, wha... more
In this episode, Jim and Derek are joined by Chris because he knows a lot about explosions, and we need to use all of these weapons of mass destruction to terraform a planet. Then, how do we build a bridge across the entire ocean? It doesn't matter w... more
In this episode, Jim and Derek are joined by Jonathan to try and figure out why wood doesn't just melt when it gets hot. Then, we talk about the types of pain that a totally invulnerable person may (or may not) experience.
Panelists: Jim, Derek, J... more
In this episode, JIm and Derek are joined by Justin and Aly to discuss whether we should build a separate internet. Honestly, it seems like a good idea on paper. Then, how can we make the labyrinth a more effective trap using modern technology?
Pa... more
People also subscribe to these shows.

If you like humorous hypothetical questions dosed with just a tinge of plausibility, you'll love Vaguely Scientific.
Fun, funny, clean, and occasionally thought provoking; they accept feedback and user submitted questions as well, giving it a good community feel and keeping them in touch with listeners.
This podcast gives you the best of both worlds - fun and science together! I really like that the hosts (and their rotating third/fourth) take questions that really have no basis in reality, let alone science, and try to answer them as though they were questions posited in good faith. The hosts are engaging, their banter is easy to follow, and their run time (usually at half an hour) makes for a quick, fun jaunt that adds fun to any day I listen. Definitely recommended!
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.









Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
The podcast presents a light-hearted and humorous approach to scientific concepts by addressing audience-submitted questions that vary widely in seriousness and absurdity. Episodes typically feature a panel of hosts engaging in lively discussions and banter as they attempt to apply scientific reasoning to quirky inquiries related to everyday life, mythology, and pop culture. The humor is central to the show, making complex topics accessible and entertaining, often with amusing tangents and playful critiques of both scientific and nonsensical ideas.
A unique aspect of the show is its commitment to audience interaction, as listeners contribute questions that inspire discussions. The format encourages creativity and imagination, allowing for ... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Vaguely Scientific. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Vaguely Scientific and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Vaguely Scientific, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Vaguely Scientific, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Vaguely Scientific has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Vaguely Scientific:
Vaguely Scientific launched 7 years ago and published 199 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Vaguely Scientific from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Vaguely Scientific. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Vaguely Scientific include:
1. Spooky Dave
2. Big A
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.