Rephonic
Artwork for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

Brad Neal
Smith V. Arizona
Chevron Doctrine
Title VII Of the Civil Rights Act
Ninth Circuit
Omission Liability
Sex Discrimination
Removal Hearings
Immigration Law
Securities Law
Rule 10b-5
Employment Law
Discrimination Claims
Campos-Chavez V. Garland
Notice Of Hearing
Notice To Appear
Federal Bureau Of Investigation
No-Fly List
National Security
Judicial Review
Procedural Due Process

A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon

PublishesDailyEpisodes1026Founded3 years ago
Number of ListenersCategories
GovernmentEducationHistory

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

Trump, President of U.S. v. Cook | 01/21/26 | Docket #: 25A312 25A312 TRUMP V. COOK DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 2654786 THE APPLICATION FOR STAY PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM REFERRED TO THE COURT IS DEFERRED PENDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN JANUARY ... more

M & K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM Pension Fund | 01/20/26 | Docket #: 23-1209 23-1209 M & K EMPLOYEE SOLUTIONS, LLC V. TRUSTEES OF THE IAM PENSION FUND DECISION BELOW: 92 F.4th 316 QUESTION PRESENTED: The Employee Retirement Income Secu... more

Wolford v. Lopez | 01/20/26 | Docket #: 24-1046 24-1046 WOLFORD V. LOPEZ DECISION BELOW: 116 F.4th 959 LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION. CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025 QUESTION PRESENTED: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bru... more

Galette v. NJ Transit Corp. | 01/14/26 | Docket #: 24-1021 24-1021 GALETTE V. NJ TRANSIT CORP. DECISION BELOW: 332 A.3d 776 THE PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI ARE GRANTED, LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER THE NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATI... more

Key Facts

Accepts Guests
Accepts Sponsors
Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Divided Argument
Divided ArgumentWill Baude, Dan Epps
Amarica's Constitution
Amarica's ConstitutionAkhil Reed Amar
We the People
We the PeopleNational Constitution Center
Advisory Opinions
Advisory OpinionsThe Dispatch

Host

Brad Neal
Attorney and software engineer, hosting discussions on Supreme Court oral arguments.

Reviews

4.9 out of 5 stars from 352 ratings
  • Convenience & Problem Fixing

    I deeply appreciate the way you make Supreme Court oral arguments so accessible. The official site often falls short in providing an intuitive, podcast-like experience for listening to these proceedings, but you’ve achieved something remarkable by doing just that. Thank you!

    I’ve listened to over 500 arguments in full, and the breadth of legal insight I’ve gained is invaluable. It’s a true pleasure and has been instrumental in fulfilling my ongoing passion for legal knowledge.

    Once again, than... more

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    vhsgus
    United Statesa year ago
  • Great public service

    Much appreciated public service

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    The1234567829572947284
    United States2 years ago
  • many thanks !

    An incredibly useful + convenient resource for any American citizen -- or anyone else with an interest, professional or personal, in American jurisprudence. Many thanks to the law student who took the time to set up here, in podcast format, the audio recordings (and transcription) of oral arguments for each case taken up by the Supreme Court in real time.

    A genuinely educational resource providing additional ease of access to the daily workings of our highest judicial body. Simple, to the poin... more

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    _teni_
    United States2 years ago
  • Great resource

    Convenient and interesting!

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    gabmar2598
    United States3 years ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

The show is acknowledged for dispelling misconceptions about the Supreme Court and providing a direct look into courtroom proceedings, making complex legal issues more approachable.
Listeners deeply appreciate the accessibility provided to Supreme Court oral arguments, praising the educational value and convenience of the resource.
Many describe the podcast as an incredibly useful tool for understanding American jurisprudence, highlighting its importance for citizens interested in legal processes.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#227
United States/History
Apple Podcasts
#109
South Korea/History
Apple Podcasts
#204
India/History

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

Little v. Hecox
Q: Does the justification for a classification, as you have in Title IX, male, female sports, apply here?
Yes, sex classifications like this require some justification for being valid which speaks to the interest of protecting women's sports.
Little v. Hecox
Q: So how do you square our various case law, Caban, Lear, Claiborne, VMI in particular, all of whom involved a subclass of people who challenged on equal protection grounds their exclusion from a definition?
Caban involved a facial challenge, whereas Hecox's situation comes into an as-applied challenge to only a small subset.
Little v. Hecox
Q: How does that work in this case when we're talking about one individual being accepted or included in a particular category?
The law's baseline passes intermediate scrutiny, and if the sex classification works at that level, individual exceptions fall under a rational basis review.
Hamm v. Smith
Q: How do you understand the role of state law in making that determination?
The Eighth Amendment permits states to define who qualifies as intellectually disabled, thus state law is fundamental in this context.
FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund
Q: Justice Sotomayor inquired about the balance that Congress sought with the ICA amendments.
Congress was primarily concerned about enforcement and the role of the SEC.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

What is The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

Focusing on Supreme Court oral arguments since 2010, this podcast makes legal proceedings more accessible to a broader audience. By presenting detailed discussions on actual cases, the content offers insight into the judicial decision-making process, which is likely to appeal not only to legal professionals but also to laypersons interested in civic matters and governmental functioning. Unique in its commitment to transparency, this podcast sheds light on the practical workings of the highest court in the United States, making it particularly valuable for those looking to deepen their understanding of the law and its implications on society.

Where can I find podcast stats for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

These podcasts share a similar audience with The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments:

1. Divided Argument
2. Amarica's Constitution
3. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
4. We the People
5. Advisory Opinions

How many episodes of The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments are there?

The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments launched 3 years ago and published 1026 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days