
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 1050 | Founded | 4 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | HistoryEducationGovernment | |||

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. | 04/29/26 | Docket #: 24-889 24-889 HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS V. AMARIN PHARMA, INC. DECISION BELOW: 104 F.4th 1370 CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2026 QUESTION PRESENTED: Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act "[... more
Mullin, Sec. of Homeland Security v. Doe | 04/29/26 | Docket #: 25-1083 25-1083 MULLIN, SEC. DHS V. DOE DECISION BELOW: CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A952) PRESENTED TO JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND BY HER REFERRED TO THE COURT IS DEFERRED. CO... more
Cisco Systems v. Doe I | 04/28/26 | Docket #: 24-856 24-856 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. DOE I DECISION BELOW: 73 F.4th 700 GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTIONS 1 AND 3 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION. CERT. GRANTED 1/9/2026 QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Whether the Alien Tort... more
Monsanto Co. v. Durnell | 04/27/26 | Docket #: 24-1068 24-1068 MONSANTO CO. V. DURNELL DECISION BELOW: 707 S.W.3d 828 GRANTED LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT PREEMPTS A LABEL- BASED F... more
People also subscribe to these shows.




Thanks for making the oral arguments easily accessible. I appreciate the public service
I love that the case summary and questions are in the descriptions now. So helpful! Thank you! At work, I couldn’t listen to the live oral argument this morning for Wolford v. Lopez, so I was psyched when I saw it already uploaded for my long drive home. No more waiting days for new cases to be available like other podcasts I’ve tried. Thorough and punctual is much appreciated! Definitely going to check out his new website to see what other legal goodies he’s cooked up for SCOTUS nerds like me.
I deeply appreciate the way you make Supreme Court oral arguments so accessible. The official site often falls short in providing an intuitive, podcast-like experience for listening to these proceedings, but you’ve achieved something remarkable by doing just that. Thank you!
I’ve listened to over 500 arguments in full, and the breadth of legal insight I’ve gained is invaluable. It’s a true pleasure and has been instrumental in fulfilling my ongoing passion for legal knowledge.
Once again, than... more
Much appreciated public service
An incredibly useful + convenient resource for any American citizen -- or anyone else with an interest, professional or personal, in American jurisprudence. Many thanks to the law student who took the time to set up here, in podcast format, the audio recordings (and transcription) of oral arguments for each case taken up by the Supreme Court in real time.
A genuinely educational resource providing additional ease of access to the daily workings of our highest judicial body. Simple, to the poin... more
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #173 | |
Apple Podcasts | #212 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
A deep dive into Supreme Court oral arguments with episodes focused on how federal and state legal frameworks interact, particularly around issues like preemption, constitutional rights, and procedural law. Across episodes, listeners get analysis of how justices interpret statutes, how arguments are framed, and what implications court decisions may have for business, policy, and everyday life. Notable strengths include accessible breakdowns of dense legal topics, a consistent focus on how arguments unfold in real time, and a cadence that helps non-lawyers grasp complex proceedings. The show appears especially valuable for lawyers, policy professionals, students, and anyone seeking a clearer view of the Court's day-to-day workings.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments:
1. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
2. U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
3. Divided Argument
4. We the People
5. Advisory Opinions
The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments launched 4 years ago and published 1050 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments include:
1. Mr. Wall
2. Mr. Surrey
3. Mr. Unikowsky
4. Ali Hemani
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.