Rephonic
Artwork for #SistersInLaw

#SistersInLaw

Politicon
Donald Trump
Supreme Court
Department Of Justice
First Amendment
Voting Rights
Trump
Trump Administration
Project 2025
Voting Rights Act
Gerrymandering
Birthright Citizenship
Georgia
Pam Bondi
Political Violence
Jack Smith
ICE
Abortion Rights
Fani Willis
Civil Rights
Epstein Files

Politicon brings the brilliant team of political and legal masterminds together for Politicon's #SistersInLaw. Joyce Vance, Jill Wine-Banks, Barb McQuade, and Kimberly Atkins Stohr will pull back the curtain on how our government actually works, take on the corrupt, share their wisdom and give us their rulings on the latest in politics, law, and culture.

PublishesDailyEpisodes336Founded6 years ago
Number of ListenersCategories
PoliticsNewsNews Commentary

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for #SistersInLaw

Latest Episodes

Jill Wine-Banks hosts #SistersInLaw to discuss the SCOTUS ruling shutting down Trump’s executive order limiting mail-in voting, what it means for the upcoming midterm elections, who dissented and why, and what it means for future challenges to voting... more

Joyce Vance and Barb McQuade answer listener questions on everything from Trump’s White House ballroom to the insanity defense, and more. They discuss the Supreme Court’s halt of construction without deciding its legality, Congress’s unused power of ... more

YouTube

Joyce Vance hosts #SistersInLaw to discuss Trump’s unusual payments to his staff and his promise of $5,000 to voters if they vote for Republicans during the midterm elections. Then, the #Sisters dissect the gerrymandering battle in Missouri, looking ... more

YouTube

Barb McQuaid and Jill Wine-Banks answer listener questions on everything from ICE accountability to vacated convictions, and more. They discuss why courts cannot independently prosecute federal agents who overstep the law, immunity barriers in civil ... more

YouTube

Key Facts

Accepts Sponsors
Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Main Justice
Main JusticeMS NOW, Andrew Weissmann, Mary McCord
Talking Feds
Talking FedsHarry Litman
UnJustified
UnJustifiedMSW Media
The Rachel Maddow Show
The Rachel Maddow ShowRachel Maddow, MS NOW

Recent Guests

Jill Fomley
Questioner introducing herself from Geneva, Illinois
Listener
Episode: 317: A Monument To Ego
John Walsh
Denver district attorney
Denver District Attorney's Office
Episode: 299: DOJ In Jeopardy: Live In Denver
Vicki Cowart
CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains
Planned Parenthood
Episode: 299: DOJ In Jeopardy: Live In Denver
Maureen Comey
Former prosecutor in the Southern District of New York and daughter of former FBI Director James Comey
Episode: 254: Threat To The First Amendment
Marc Elias
Expert in voting rights and founder of Democracy Docket
Democracy Docket
Episode: 195: In The Hands Of The Voters with Marc Elias
Katie Phang
MSNBC host and legal analyst
MSNBC
Episode: 192: Everything Is Insane
Barb McQuade
Legal expert and author of the book "Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America".
Politicon
Episode: 173: Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America

Hosts

Joyce Vance
Host of Hashtag Sisters In Law and related formats; prominent legal commentator.
Jill Wine-Banks
Co-host and legal commentator; sets the tone with practical legal insights.
Barb McQuade
Co-host and legal commentator; frequent authority on DOJ and judiciary matters.
Kimberly Atkins Stohr
Co-host providing political and legal analysis with emphasis on policy implications.

Reviews

4.9 out of 5 stars from 12.1k ratings
  • Great Pod…if you can overlook a few things

    Advertising. The show is half infomercial and promoting. I understand the need to make a buck but it feels a bit moneyed centric.

    Jill Wine-Banks. Is way outta touch, insensitive, and often just plain rude and hurtful. Rude and hurtful to the listeners, to her cohosts, to the people in her life. Today’s episode she outright age shamed someone she supposedly loves for getting married for the first time at an age Jill considers too old for a first marriage. She’s a mean girl.

    Apple Podcasts
    3
    Kat7427
    United States17 days ago
  • Half the podcast is ads

    Great content if you can actually get to the legal information. Half the podcast is now the hosts exclaiming how fabulous an array of products are. Buy now! But wait there’s more! Figure out another way, people. It’s getting obnoxious and demeans your expertise.

    Apple Podcasts
    2
    SF Barbara
    United States21 days ago
  • Kennedy Ctr fiasco

    Trump may demolish the Kennedy Center in the middle of the night:

    When I was working in Trump tower, Trump had purchased a art deco building that had housed Bonwit Teller. The contract required that Trump statuary at the top of the building and donate it to the Met.

    Instead, Trump demolished the entire building in the middle of the night with what appeared to be undocumented labor. A clear violation of his contractual obligation.

    Trump demolished the East wing without congressional approval... more

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Lee Esq
    United States21 days ago
  • Trump and babies

    Trump is NOT like a baby! To say so is to defame all babies!

    Apple Podcasts
    4
    Dcindc&md
    United States22 days ago
  • Does she sound like Jill?

    Jill. I just listened to a pod (Bullwark Daily). A guest named Julia Curley. U got to listen to her voice ! She’s smart and sounds like ur experience except in the present. Her voice sounds exactly like u! Hope u track down an interview u can listen to. Love the show and all the Sisters

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    LoriJNY
    United Statesa month ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Guests and hosts offer strong perspectives on governance and accountability.
Insightful legal analysis with engaging discussion style.
Smart, thoughtful, and accessible explanations of complex issues.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#20
United States/News/Politics
Apple Podcasts
#60
United States/News
Apple Podcasts
#66
Canada/News/Politics
Apple Podcasts
#200
United Kingdom/News/Politics
Apple Podcasts
#213
Canada/News
Apple Podcasts
#160
Australia/News/Politics

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

337: Pro Bono Pros
Q: What does it mean to vacate a conviction and how does it differ from expungement?
Vacating a conviction means the case is dismissed and the record is not visible in standard checks, whereas expungement completely erases the record. Both require legal steps like motions and hearings, but expungement does not automatically restore rights such as gun ownership.
337: Pro Bono Pros
Q: Do courts possess any inherent constitutional or equitable authority to provide a remedy when a government agent abuses power?
No; the judiciary generally cannot directly intervene in such cases, as prosecution is primarily an executive function, though civil lawsuits can sometimes be brought against agencies or individuals, and there are private causes of action with significant obstacles like immunity.
333: Weekend At Mitch’s
Q: How does the SCOTUS emergency docket differ from the merits docket?
The merits docket involves full briefing, invited amicus briefs, oral arguments, and deliberation with a normal chance for all sides to be heard, while the emergency/shadow docket handles interim orders quickly, often without full briefing or public arguments, and can result in swift rulings that feel final.
334: He’s Like A Little Baby
Q: Ben asks whether limiting presidential pardons would require a constitutional amendment.
Yes, altering presidential pardon powers would require a constitutional amendment because pardons are defined in the Constitution and cannot be changed by ordinary legislation.
334: He’s Like A Little Baby
Q: Ellen asks about constitutional vs. illegal in the context of presidential actions, including cryptocurrency implications and emoluments.
Constitutional issues and legality are distinct; something can be unconstitutional and illegal. The emoluments clause and other laws can render actions illegal even if unconstitutional, but changing a constitutional ruling requires a constitutional amendment, not ordinary legislation.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About #SistersInLaw

What is #SistersInLaw about and what kind of topics does it cover?

A sharp, legally informed panel analyzes U.S. political and legal developments through a civics-forward, no-nonsense lens. Episodes blend rigorous constitutional and statutory analysis with personality-driven banter, tackling topics like DOJ actions, impeachment, the Supreme Court, election law, media freedom, and current events. The hosts' expertise and cross-ideological perspectives create accessible explanations of complex issues, often with practical takeaways for listeners who want clarity on how laws and government power shape the news cycle. A standout feature is the careful balance between rigorous legal reasoning and engaging, relatable discussion, with sponsor reads woven into a lively, opinionated format rather than heavy-handed ... more

Where can I find podcast stats for #SistersInLaw?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for #SistersInLaw. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to #SistersInLaw and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does #SistersInLaw get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for #SistersInLaw, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for #SistersInLaw?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for #SistersInLaw, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does #SistersInLaw have?

To see how many followers or subscribers #SistersInLaw has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to #SistersInLaw?

These podcasts share a similar audience with #SistersInLaw:

1. Main Justice
2. Talking Feds
3. UnJustified
4. The Best People with Nicolle Wallace
5. The Rachel Maddow Show

How many episodes of #SistersInLaw are there?

#SistersInLaw launched 6 years ago and published 336 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact #SistersInLaw?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for #SistersInLaw?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for #SistersInLaw from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for #SistersInLaw?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of #SistersInLaw. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on #SistersInLaw?

Recent guests on #SistersInLaw include:

1. Jill Fomley
2. John Walsh
3. Vicki Cowart
4. Maureen Comey
5. Marc Elias
6. Katie Phang
7. Barb McQuade

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days