Rephonic
Artwork for Oral Arguments

Oral Arguments - The Supreme Court of the United States

Charles Usen
Second Amendment
Cox Communications
Investment Company Act
United States Supreme Court
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
Hawaii Firearms Law
Title IX
Sony Music Entertainment
Bruin Decision
Federal Tort Claims Act
Helms-Burton Act
Judicial Estoppel
Private Property Rights
Copyright Law
Internet Service Providers
Private Right Of Action
First Amendment
Rescission
Sixth Amendment
Louisiana

This podcast is about the oral arguments of cases at the United States Supreme Court.

My desire is to bring closer to you Supreme Court arguments that eventually lead to landmark decisions. Enjoy!

PublishesDailyEpisodes54Founded3 months ago
Number of ListenersCategory
Government

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for Oral Arguments

Latest Episodes

Facts

The case involves a challenge to the Biden administration's efforts to dismantle a Trump-era immigration program known as the "Remain in Mexico" policy (officially the Migrant Protection Protocols or MPP). The policy required certain asylum se... more

Case Summary:

The FCC fined major wireless carriers over $100 million for unlawfully selling access to customer location data to third parties without consent. AT&T received a $57 million fine, and Verizon received nearly $47 million. The fines stem... more

Facts

Ongkaruck Sripetch ran penny-stock "pump-and-dump" schemes, artificially inflating prices before selling to unwitting investors. He pleaded guilty to criminal securities fraud and served 21 months in prison. In a parallel civil proceeding, a C... more

Background & Facts

The case arises from an SEC civil enforcement action against Ongkaruck Sripetch, who orchestrated a series of fraudulent "pump-and-dump" schemes involving penny-stock companies. Sripetch artificially inflated stock prices through ... more

Case Summary:

In the case of Trump, President of the United States v. Barbara (Docket No. 25-365), argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on April 1, 2026, the relevant facts are as follows:

Fact Summary

The litigation is a landmark... more

Case Summary:

In the case of Pitchford v. Cain (Docket No. 24-7351), argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 31, 2026, the relevant facts are as follows:

Fact Summary

The case involves Terry Pitchford, who was convicted of c... more

Case Summary:

In the case of Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties (Docket No. 25-83), argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 2026, the relevant facts are as follows:

Fact Summary

The litigation began when Adrian Jules, a for... more

Case Summary:

In the case of Abouammo v. United States (Docket No. 25-5146), argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 2026, the relevant facts are as follows:

Fact Summary

The litigation involves Ahmad Abouammo, a former ... more

Key Facts

Accepts Guests
Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#72
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#31
South Africa/Government
Apple Podcasts
#59
Poland/Government
Apple Podcasts
#180
India/Government

Top Government Podcasts

Strict Scrutiny
Strict ScrutinyStrict Scrutiny
American Power
American PowerChad Scott, Nat Towsen, Mr. Global
5-4
5-4Prologue Projects
The DSR Network
The DSR NetworkThe DSR Network
Optimist Economy
Optimist EconomyKathryn Anne Edwards and Robin Rauzi
The Chris Plante Show
The Chris Plante ShowWMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare PodcastThe Lawfare Institute
American Potential
American PotentialAmerican Potential

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises: Date Argued - 23rd February, 2026
Q: Why isn't the statute also work great if we understand that it has a provision that gives some authority to the FCSC?
The claim doesn't stand in isolation; Section 682 requires proof of ownership of the claim.
Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises: Date Argued - 23rd February, 2026
Q: How could Cuba confiscate docks that it owned?
The statutory definition of confiscated refers to seizure of ownership or control of the property.
Pung v. Isabella County: Argued on 25th February, 2026
Q: How do we determine that? Do we look at history and tradition?
We look to history and tradition to determine what a fair sale looks like.
Pung v. Isabella County: Argued on 25th February, 2026
Q: What do you do with the fact that the English and American legal traditions seem to permit these sorts of foreclosures?
The process that Isabella County undertook lacked protections historically built in to ensure fairness.
Ellingburg v. United States: Oral Argument
Q: Do you think that all sanctions imposed in criminal proceedings are, in fact, penal or criminal?
So I think this is an important distinction, Justice Thomas, and I want to be clear that we do distinguish between what is part of a criminal sentence and what occurs at criminal sentencing.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About Oral Arguments

What is Oral Arguments about and what kind of topics does it cover?

Focusing on the oral arguments from the United States Supreme Court, this podcast provides listeners with direct access to critical discussions on high-profile cases that shape the legal landscape. Each episode captures the essence of landmark legal debates, featuring intricate details on case law and the constitutional principles at play. Topics span from civil rights to campaign finance, covering the complexities of legislation and how they impact various facets of society. The unique approach of presenting full oral arguments allows listeners to engage deeply with the judicial process, enhancing their understanding of significant legal precedents and contemporary legal issues. This podcast is particularly appealing for those interested i... more

Where can I find podcast stats for Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Oral Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Oral Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does Oral Arguments get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Oral Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Oral Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does Oral Arguments have?

To see how many followers or subscribers Oral Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

How many episodes of Oral Arguments are there?

Oral Arguments launched 3 months ago and published 54 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact Oral Arguments?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for Oral Arguments?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Oral Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for Oral Arguments?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Oral Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days