Are you confident you can reason clearly? Are you able to convince others of your point of view? Are you able to give plausible reasons for believing what you believe? Do you sometimes read arguments in the newspapers, hear them on the television, or in the pub and wish you knew how to confidently evaluate them? In this six-part course, you will learn all about arguments, how to identify them, how... more
Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 13 | Founded | 15 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | PhilosophyEducationSociety & Culture |
So you've finished this series of podcasts. Find out where to go from here... Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales; creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies. These are bad arguments that can easily be mistaken for good arguments. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wa... more
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies. These are bad arguments that can easily be mistaken for good arguments. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wa... more
Part five of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this lecture we will continue with the evaluation of arguments - this time deductive arguments - focusing in particular on the notion of validity. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Sh... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
Six recorded lectures. She knows her stuff, HOWEVER:
You can’t see her slides, you can’t see what she writes on the board, you can’t see what she’s pointing at.
The audience isn’t miked, and she doesn’t consistently repeat their questions/comments. So you can either be frustrated you are missing their contributions, or raise your volume to hear the audience but then the lecturer is painfully loud.
Not for people who want to argue better, you have to really be a philosophical logic nerd.
The professor encourages the students to engage from an intuitive perspective, but since they have no training in formal logic, their comments are usually misguided and of no consequence for the listener. This is surely a fun course in person, but it does not work as a podcast.
The worst thing about the lectures is that
I CAN’T HEAR THE STUDENTS, SO THE PROFESSOR’S TALK BECOMES FRAGMENTED AND LOSES MEANING SINCE YOU ONLY HEAR HALF THE CONVERSATION. To make things worse, I can’t even hear the p... more
Thanks to Marianne for allowing to share your knowledge and content in such matter.
Thank you for releasing this course to let anyone in the world could share the privilege to be part of the class! I enjoy the content but had really struggled with the volume variations - every 15-30s rolling back to turn up volume to hear a student’s question; then fearing deaf when the professor started speaking!
I’ve asked a sound technician who advised that it’s a really simple job nowadays to ‘compress the volume’ to narrow the volume variations to make all the content more audible. Hope O... more
Why cant you tell us what the behind pillar used for creating the sound pillar in RedDragon about
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #205 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
Social Media Reach |
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Critical Reasoning for Beginners. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Critical Reasoning for Beginners and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Critical Reasoning for Beginners, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Critical Reasoning for Beginners, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Critical Reasoning for Beginners has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Critical Reasoning for Beginners:
Critical Reasoning for Beginners launched 15 years ago and published 13 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Critical Reasoning for Beginners from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Critical Reasoning for Beginners. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.