13 wrongful convictions all tied to one forensic analyst. The analyst – Mary Jane Burton – was hailed as a hero for saving the DNA evidence that led to the exonerations. But when reporter Tessa Kramer starts investigating, she meets a former lab trainee with a very different – and much darker – story to tell. Over the course of 12 episodes, Kramer unravels this mystery, searching for proof of expl... more
Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 15 | Founded | 2 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | Society & CultureDocumentaryTrue Crime |
Content advisory: this episode makes mention of the sexual assault and murder of a child. Please take care if listening. more
As we come to the end of season one, reporter Tessa Kramer is left with some lingering questions. How are the injustices we've seen in this story woven into the DNA of our criminal legal system? Is there hope for genuine reform? And what role can for... more
The final episode of our first season is coming soon, but first: a message from Tessa on the arrest of her friend, Evan Gershkovich, a Wall Street Journal reporter who is wrongfully detained in Russia. For more information, visit www.freegershkovich.... more
The case of Earl Washington left a permanent stain on Virginia’s state crime lab. What does this case, and its aftermath, reveal about the lab's record of reviewing misconduct within its own four walls? more
Find out how many people listen to Admissible: Shreds of Evidence and see how many downloads it gets.
We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database.
Listen to the audio and view podcast download numbers, contact information, listener demographics and more to help you make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on.
Update: I’ve finished the first season, and while I still stand by my opinion below, I am happy to find they’ve discovered the abysmal state of how we go about enacting criminal justice (and a more perfect double entendre has never existed). Consider this fact. Every single time we engage this system, it has already failed us. The very use of this system is the admission that something that we assign a catastrophic outcome to has happened in spite of its goals of protecting us. Instead what we a... more
This is one of the best told, throughly explained, carefully researched podcasts I have heard. What sets it apart from many others is the interest not just in what happened but why, and what could or should happen next (sadly, don’t hold your breath — the levers of justice are nearly stuck)
It’s extremely disappointing that so little care was given to how this important story was presented. The podcasters present as both immature and unprofessional. Extremely difficult to listen to the upspeak, vocal fry, and absurd way they insert themselves into the story.
The attempts to blame law enforcement are ridiculous. The round about way, often contradicting the previous reason made, to make police to blame makes me sick 🤢. Some how police are expected to mind read, see the future, and interrogate a csc victim. Mary Jane alters evidence? Police pressure is why. Victim IDs suspect but is wrong? Police fault. Victim IDs attacker on elevator? Police should have known she lied. Police do penis lineup to further ID suspect? How dare they put the victim... more
It reminds me of “in the dark,” except this narrator has a much better/less annoying voice. You can tell they really did their homework, and it’s a fascinating story! It really shows that people aren’t just good or bad, they’re complex and flawed. Good people do bad things for strange reasons.
Apple Podcasts | #242 | United States/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Apple Podcasts | #212 | Canada/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Apple Podcasts | #159 | India/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Apple Podcasts | #181 | Japan/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Apple Podcasts | #199 | Israel/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Apple Podcasts | #218 | New Zealand/Society & Culture/Documentary |
Listeners, engagement and demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | Engagement Score | Primary Location | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social Media Reach |
Rephonic provides a wide range of data for three million podcasts so you can understand how popular each one is. See how many people listen to Admissible: Shreds of Evidence and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, chart rankings, ratings and more.
Simply upgrade your account and use these figures to decide if the show is worth pitching as a guest or sponsor.
There are two ways to find viewership numbers for podcasts on YouTube. First, you can search for the show on the channel and if it has an account, scroll through the videos to see how many views it gets per episode.
Rephonic also pulls the total number of views for each podcast we find a YouTube account for. You can access these figures by upgrading your account and looking at a show's social media section.
Podcast streaming numbers or 'plays' are notoriously tricky to find. Fortunately, Rephonic provides estimated listener figures for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence and three million other podcasts in our database.
To check these stats and get a feel for the show's audience size, you'll need to upgrade your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Admissible: Shreds of Evidence has, simply upgrade your account. You'll find a whole host of extra information to help you decide whether appearing as a sponsor or guest on this podcast is right for you or your business.
If it's not, use the search tool to find other podcasts with subscriber numbers that match what you're looking for.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. You can see some of this data for free. But you will need to upgrade your account to access premium data.
Admissible: Shreds of Evidence launched 2 years ago and published 15 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contact information for you.
Our systems scan a variety of public sources including the podcast's official website, RSS feed, and email databases to provide you with a trustworthy source of podcast contact information. We also have our own research team on-hand to manually find email addresses if you can't find exactly what you're looking for.
Rephonic pulls reviews for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence from multiple sources, including Apple Podcasts, Castbox, Podcast Addict and more.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide whether this podcast is worth pitching as a guest or sponsor.
You can view podcasts similar to Admissible: Shreds of Evidence by exploring Rephonic's 3D interactive graph. This tool uses the data displayed on the 'Listeners Also Subscribed To' section of Apple Podcasts to visualise connections between shows.