13 wrongful convictions all tied to one forensic analyst. The analyst – Mary Jane Burton – was hailed as a hero for saving the DNA evidence that led to the exonerations. But when reporter Tessa Kramer starts investigating, she meets a former lab trainee with a very different – and much darker – story to tell. Over the course of 12 episodes, Kramer unravels this mystery, searching for proof of expl... more
Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 15 | Founded | 3 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | DocumentaryTrue CrimeSociety & Culture |
Content advisory: this episode makes mention of the sexual assault and murder of a child. Please take care if listening.
In this special update episode of Admissible, Tessa Kramer returns to the mic to explore the aftermath of our 12-part series. Ou... more
As we come to the end of season one, reporter Tessa Kramer is left with some lingering questions. How are the injustices we've seen in this story woven into the DNA of our criminal legal system? Is there hope for genuine reform? And what role can for... more
The final episode of our first season is coming soon, but first: a message from Tessa on the arrest of her friend, Evan Gershkovich, a Wall Street Journal reporter who is wrongfully detained in Russia. For more information, visit www.freegershkovich.... more
The case of Earl Washington left a permanent stain on Virginia’s state crime lab. What does this case, and its aftermath, reveal about the lab's record of reviewing misconduct within its own four walls?
More information on the case of Earl Washingto... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
The reporting on this story is compelling and thoroughly researched. I am hooked!
Anger and anguish is what I felt after binging this excellently investigated podcast. Sooo many unnecessary & avoidable victims and survivors. Sorry to them for the burned they have had to carry due to “incompetence & malfeasance”.
If you liked this podcast listen to Australia’s Shandee’s Legacy. It too will drop your jaw over systemic failures and keeping a blind eye.
Update: I’ve finished the first season, and while I still stand by my opinion below, I am happy to find they’ve discovered the abysmal state of how we go about enacting criminal justice (and a more perfect double entendre has never existed). Consider this fact. Every single time we engage this system, it has already failed us. The very use of this system is the admission that something that we assign a catastrophic outcome to has happened in spite of its goals of protecting us. Instead what we a... more
This is one of the best told, throughly explained, carefully researched podcasts I have heard. What sets it apart from many others is the interest not just in what happened but why, and what could or should happen next (sadly, don’t hold your breath — the levers of justice are nearly stuck)
It’s extremely disappointing that so little care was given to how this important story was presented. The podcasters present as both immature and unprofessional. Extremely difficult to listen to the upspeak, vocal fry, and absurd way they insert themselves into the story.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
Social Media Reach |
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Admissible: Shreds of Evidence and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Admissible: Shreds of Evidence has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Admissible: Shreds of Evidence:
1. The Binge Cases: Doctor's Orders
2. Cold Blooded: Mystery in Alaska
3. Betrayal: Weekly
4. The Binge Crimes: The Vanishing of Janis Rose
5. Who Took Misty Copsey?
Admissible: Shreds of Evidence launched 3 years ago and published 15 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Admissible: Shreds of Evidence from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Admissible: Shreds of Evidence. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.