
Fifteen minutes long, because you're in a hurry, and we're not that smart.
| Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 976 | Founded | 11 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | BusinessCareersFiction | |||

To celebrate Mary Robinette’s birthday today (!!), she is taking us inside the craft (and emotional engine) of her short story “With Her Serpent Locks,” using it as a case study in beginnings, control, and creative “leveling up.” Our hosts dig into g... more
In this episode, our hosts dive into what makes a strong beginning and why it matters so much to readers. They talk about openings as an act of hospitality, exploring how tone, control, and carefully chosen details help readers feel grounded and care... more
Today, our hosts dig into how stories can feel fresh without losing what readers love. They explore the idea of “same but different” across genres, sequels, and series—looking at how small shifts in structure, context, tone, or theme can create meani... more
Our hosts take on the Hero’s Journey—where it came from, why it endures, and why it can make writers uneasy. They break it down as a tool (and not a rule), exploring how pattern recognition works in storytelling without turning structure into a formu... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





7 minutes of commercials before episode even begins. This show is all ads and has gotten less helpful over time.
Great advice but for a 20 minute episode, 10+ minutes are ads.
What a great find after scrolling through podcasts. Wonderful guests in purposeful conversation; I’ve learned so much!
the older episodes of writing excuses are excellent, and the newer still hold some insight
the older episodes of writing excuses are excellent, and the newer still hold some insight
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #115 | |
Apple Podcasts | #98 | |
Apple Podcasts | #132 | |
Apple Podcasts | #70 | |
Apple Podcasts | #78 | |
Apple Podcasts | #93 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
The content revolves around offering concise and effective writing advice, facilitating discussions that cater to aspiring and seasoned writers alike. The hosts cover a wide array of topics including narrative techniques, the intricacies of pitching one's work, diversifying income streams, and the dynamics of character relationships. Episodes often feature valuable strategies for improving writing skills through the exploration of industry experiences and personal anecdotes. Notably, there is an emphasis on accessibility, making complex concepts understandable and relatable to listeners, which sets it apart as a uniquely supportive platform for writers navigating their creative journeys.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Writing Excuses. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Writing Excuses and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Writing Excuses, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Writing Excuses, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Writing Excuses has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Writing Excuses:
1. The Shit No One Tells You About Writing
2. Helping Writers Become Authors
3. Fiction Writing Made Easy | Top Creative Writing Podcast for Fiction Writers & Writing Tips
4. Essential Guide to Writing a Novel
5. Search Engine
Writing Excuses launched 11 years ago and published 976 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Writing Excuses from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Writing Excuses. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Writing Excuses include:
1. Dr. Tara Lepore
2. Erin Roberts
3. Charlie Jane Anders
4. Charles Duhigg
5. Christopher Schwarz
6. Chuck Tingle
7. Mark Oshiro
8. Kate McKean
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.