
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supre... more
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 514 | Founded | 13 days ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | EducationGovernment | ||||

www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_smsNo one Authorized President Trump to impose these "Emergency" Tariffs under the IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act).
Send us a textThe Court Below granted relief when it should have not.Judge Niemeyer of the 4th Circuit was the lone dissent--contending that the majority had defied AEDPA’s standard of review--the 84 year old Jurist with 36 years service on that cour... more
Send us a text The Court unanimously held that restitution imposed under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is a form of criminal punishment, meaning it cannot be applied to conduct that occurred before the statute was enacted without violating th... more
www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_smsState Courts may not grant releif from FEDERAL causes of action by reference to state statute.
www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_smsan appeal of a VOID judgement under federal rule 60 is still subject to the statutory text's "within a reasonable time" limit.
Send us a text1. The Court has jurisdiction because §2244(b)(3)(E) does not bar this Court’s review of a federal prisoner’s request to file a second or successive §2255 motion. Pp. 5–19. (a) Section 2244(b)(3)(E) provides that the denial of authoriza... more
Send us a textSupreme Court refuses to assume that Congress intended to disregard Blockburger and allow someone to be convicted of two crimes in the same statute. Congress' clear intent here was to create two potential sentencing schemes, not allow s... more
www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_smsSupreme Court Upholds Montana's Community Caretaker exception to the 4th amendment prohibition on warrantless searches.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #188 |










Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
| Social Media Reach | |||||
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Supreme Court Decision Syllabus and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Supreme Court Decision Syllabus has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus launched 13 days ago and published 514 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Supreme Court Decision Syllabus. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.