
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supre... more
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 538 | Founded | 8 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | GovernmentEducation | |||

Send us Fan Mail
First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amend ment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing.
Support the show
Send us Fan Mail
In Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court held that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8), which created an additional majority-Black district, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander because race predominated in its design withou... more
Send us Fan Mail
Because §1446(b)(1)’s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge’s removal was untimely. Pp. 5–14. (a) The fact that the 30-day removal deadline in §1446(b)(1) is non jurisdictional does not auto... more
Send us Fan Mail
Totality of the Circumstances is required in considering Probable Cause for a temporary stop. Probable Cause being defined as: "Articulable reasonable suspicion for the officers belief that 'criminal activity is afoot.'"
People also subscribe to these shows.




I find this podcast to be very valuable. I appreciate hearing the summary the cases in a short clear and concise methods. The various speakers are clear and makes understanding the content much easier. Thank you for doing this.
This podcast is exactly what I was looking for to be able to easily access new US Supreme Court decisions. Thank you!
Great podcast in a scarce genre of journalism that covers the judicial branch of government. I would recommend giving listeners the full decision breakdown before reading the full opinion, or at least giving the author of the opinion before reading it. I find myself either getting confused or losing interest or losing interest because I’m confused about the opinion before the end. Knowing the opinion author at the end is unhelpful. This term has several topics with 2 or more similar cases which ... more
Absolutely love this podcast. Super useful and just wish I got CLE credits for listening to these - two birds with one stone.
Absolutely love this podcast. Super useful and just wish I got CLE credits for listening to these - two birds with one stone.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #38 | |
Apple Podcasts | #199 | |
Apple Podcasts | #213 | |
Apple Podcasts | #227 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | Gender Skew | Location | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interests | Professions | Age Range | |||
| Household Income | Social Media Reach | ||||
This legal-annotated reading series focuses on Supreme Court decision syllabi presented without commentary, offering precise, information-dense rundowns of rulings and their core legal questions. Across episodes, listeners are likely to encounter topics like First Amendment rights, voting rights, civil procedure, and various constitutional concerns, all framed through the syllabus and supported with concise context. Notably, the format emphasizes clarity and accessibility for legal professionals, students, and public readers who want a reliable, unembellished source for understanding Court decisions, with consistently high audio quality and an emphasis on reducing promotional content. A standout is the strict no-frills approach to reading o... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Supreme Court Decision Syllabus and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Supreme Court Decision Syllabus has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Supreme Court Decision Syllabus:
1. U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
2. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
3. We the People
4. Divided Argument
5. Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus launched 8 years ago and published 538 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Supreme Court Decision Syllabus from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Supreme Court Decision Syllabus. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.