
A true crime podcast that seeks to go beyond the narrative and discover the truth. Both sides have facts, which picture comes into focus depends on how those facts are Framed.
| Publishes | Twice weekly | Episodes | 36 | Founded | 8 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | True CrimeHistory | |||

Jason Usry joins me to discuss the commutation hearing from 2010 as well as the evidence that works against Temujin Kensu ever having his sentence commuted or his conviction reversed.
Website: FramedPod.com
Instagram: @FramedPod
YouTube: Frame... more
The anguish over the lost habeas petition wasn't the only difficulty that Temujin Kensu and his supporters would face in the fall of 2010. A month before the decision, he stood before the Michigan State Parole Board, hoping to have his sentence commu... more
As we learned in the last episode, Temujin Kensu – formerly Fred Freeman, was now serving life without the possibility of parole in the Michigan prison system. Having been convicted of the crime of first-degree murder in the shotgun death of college ... more
Robin from The Trail Went Cold joins me to discuss how the defense attacked the prosecution's theory, their witnesses as well as how the public perceives a defendant with skeletons in their closet.
People also subscribe to these shows.





The bonus guest episodes are really interesting and much appreciated . Many aspects of the case are discussed. It’s not one sided. The details of the case are well
Laid out.
This isn’t the first or only podcast I’ve listened to about and certain facts remain the same. Just b/c Kensu is an abusive unlikable person doesn’t mean he killed Macklem. If you’re going to put people in jail, put them in there for the crimes they actually committed.
I’ve heard an interview of the host saying his goal is to get this guy released so it’s a slanted take on the story. This makes me question whether the other two seasons aren’t also biased.
No research and very biased. The Michigan Innocence Project looked at this case and didn’t take it on.
This podcast is all propaganda in support of a murderer. No research done. Michigan is safer because this murderer is behind bars.
Season 2 is a disgusting, word vomit, disgrace. It's 100% not factual, and based totally on the word of the murder, with zero research, and no consideration. The creator victim blames women that incurred SA and it's abhorrent. The criminal that season 2 covers, has physically and sexually abused NUMEROUS women, including the victims fiance, but not a single word is said about that. This podcast should be illegal to air, that's how bad it is. I encourage all of you to do your own research on this... more
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #236 | |
Apple Podcasts | #193 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for FRAMED: An Investigative Story. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to FRAMED: An Investigative Story and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for FRAMED: An Investigative Story, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for FRAMED: An Investigative Story, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers FRAMED: An Investigative Story has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with FRAMED: An Investigative Story:
1. Generation Why: True Crime
2. Dr. Death
3. The Vanished Podcast
4. The Binge Cases: Doctor Billions
5. The Binge Crimes: What Happened to the Harrisons?
FRAMED: An Investigative Story launched 8 years ago and published 36 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for FRAMED: An Investigative Story from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of FRAMED: An Investigative Story. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on FRAMED: An Investigative Story include:
1. Jason Usry
2. Robin Warder
3. Julia Cowley
4. Temujin Kensou
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.