
🎬 Exploring the Criterion Collection, one spine at a time.
In each episode, I sit down with film historians, critics, filmmakers, and scholars for in-depth conversations about a single film from the Criterion Collection.
I'm Ron, and I guide these expert-driven discussions examining the artistry, cultural significance, and historical context of classic and contemporary cinema. From French New W... more
| Publishes | Monthly | Episodes | 14 | Founded | 10 months ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | TV & FilmFilm HistoryFilm Interviews | |||

"See how far the truth gets you."
In this episode of Why This Film?, I'm joined by, film scholar, Sid Gottlieb to explore The 39 Steps, Alfred Hitchcock's 1935 masterpiece thriller and a Criterion Collection essential, the film where Hitchcock becam... more
"It captures an uncanny feeling that relates to grief, that there's something after, the hope we could get more time with someone we love."
In this episode of Why This Film?, Film critic Carlos Aguilar joins me to explore Birth, Jonathan Glazer's 20... more
"It's an incredibly rich film."
In this episode of Why This Film?, I'm joined by film critic and scholar Girish Shambu to explore La cérémonie, Claude Chabrol's 1995 masterpiece and Criterion Collection Spine #1199.
La cérémonie follows Sophie, a w... more
"It's a perfectly imperfect film."
In this episode of Why This Film?, I'm joined by film editor Caleb Tyson to explore Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio (2022), the Academy Award-winning stop-motion feature and Criterion Collection entry that reimagine... more
People also subscribe to these shows.




Very well constructed interviews and executed pod. Enjoyable listen.
I wouldn’t consider myself a cinephile at all. In fact, out of every episode of this podcast, I’ve only seen one of the movies. But, I’ve listened to every episode anyway and found them so incredibly interesting. It’s so well done. I’ve learned a lot. I look forward to every episode!
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #112 | |
Apple Podcasts | #133 | |
Apple Podcasts | #182 | |
Apple Podcasts | #104 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
A thoughtful, expert-driven look at cinema through the lens of the Criterion Collection. Each episode centers on a single spine, featuring conversations with film historians, critics, filmmakers, and scholars who unpack artistry, cultural significance, and historical context. The format emphasizes rigorous analysis, behind-the-scenes craft, and how a film's legacy evolves over time, making it a compelling listen for cinephiles, students, and professionals alike. Noteworthy is the emphasis on diverse perspectives—from archival scholarship to industry insight—and the way conversations illuminate why certain titles remain essential viewing for modern audiences.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Why This Film?. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Why This Film? and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Why This Film?, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Why This Film?, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Why This Film? has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Why This Film?:
1. Blank Check with Griffin & David
2. The Ezra Klein Show
3. Talking Simpsons
4. 32 Thoughts: The Podcast
Why This Film? launched 10 months ago and published 14 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Why This Film? from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Why This Film?. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Why This Film? include:
1. Carlos Aguilar
2. Girish Shambu
3. Caleb Tyson
4. Michael Repsch
5. Chris Cook
6. Jared Frederick
7. Jesse Thorn
8. James Chestnut
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.