Rephonic
Artwork for The High Court Report

The High Court Report

SCOTUS Oral Arguments
Supreme Court
First Amendment
Bowe V. United States
Fourth Amendment
Trump Tariff Cases
Ex Post Facto Clause
Ellingburg V. United States
Conversion Therapy
Transgender Rights
Trump V. Slaughter
Second Amendment
Berk V. Choy
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure
International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Constitutional Law
Separation Of Powers
Chiles V. Salazar
Villarreal V. Texas
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act
Equal Protection Clause

The High Court Report makes Supreme Court decisions accessible to everyone. We deliver comprehensive SCOTUS coverage without the legal jargon or partisan spin—just clear analysis that explains how these cases affect your life, business, and community. What you get: Case previews and breakdowns, raw oral argument audio, curated key exchanges, detailed opinion analysis, and expert commentary from a ... more

PublishesDailyEpisodes500Foundeda year ago
Number of ListenersCategories
GovernmentEducation

Listen to this Podcast

Artwork for The High Court Report

Latest Episodes

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Case No. 25-466 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 20, 2026 | Decided: June 4, 2026

Overview: The Supreme Court resolves a circuit split over whether the SEC must prove investors lost money before or... more

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Case No. 25-466 | Docket Link: Here | Argued: April 20, 2026 | Decided: June 4, 2026

Overview: The Supreme Court resolves a circuit split over whether the SEC must prove investors lost money before or... more

YouTube

FCC v. AT&T, Inc. / Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC | Case Nos. 25-406 & 25-567 | Docket Links: Here and Here | Argued: April 21, 2026 | Decided: June 4, 2026

Oral Advocates:

• Petitioners (AT&T, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.): Jeffrey B... more

YouTube

FCC v. AT&T, Inc. / Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC | Case Nos. 25-406 & 25-567 | Docket Links: Here and Here | Argued: April 21, 2026 | Decided: June 4, 2026

Overview: The FCC fined AT&T $57.3 million and Verizon $46.9 million for mishandling c... more

YouTube

Key Facts

Accepts Guests
Contact Information
Podcast Host
Number of Listeners
Find out how many people listen to this podcast per episode and each month.

Similar Podcasts

People also subscribe to these shows.

Recent Guests

Adam Unikowsky
Attorney for petitioner Jules
Jenner & Block
Episode: Oral Argument Re-Listen: Jules v. Andre Balazs | Can Federal Courts Keep Arbitration Jurisdiction from Start to Finish?
Daniel Geyser
Attorney for respondents Balazs Properties
Haynes and Boone
Episode: Oral Argument Re-Listen: Jules v. Andre Balazs | Can Federal Courts Keep Arbitration Jurisdiction from Start to Finish?
Adam Feldman
Legal expert/guest described in episode
Guest on The High Court Report
Episode: Case Preview: Hikma v. Amarin | Did Hikma's Sales Pitch Steal Amarin's Patent?
Adeel Bashir
Legal expert/guest described in episode
Guest on The High Court Report
Episode: Case Preview: Hikma v. Amarin | Did Hikma's Sales Pitch Steal Amarin's Patent?
Mark Bluebaugh
Legal expert/guest described in episode
Guest on The High Court Report
Episode: Case Preview: Hikma v. Amarin | Did Hikma's Sales Pitch Steal Amarin's Patent?
John Durnell
Plaintiff in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell; mantle cell lymphoma survivor; sprayed Roundup for over 20 years without a cancer warning on the label
Individual plaintiff in the case
Episode: Case Preview: Monsanto Co. v. Durnell | The Roundup Reckoning: The $7 Billion Battle Over Pesticide Labels
John Sauer
United States Solicitor General, argued for Petitioners Trump
U.S. Department of Justice
Episode: Oral Argument: Trump v. Barbara | Born Here, But Not American?
Cecilia D. Wang
Attorney, argued for Respondents Barbara
American Civil Liberties Union
Episode: Oral Argument: Trump v. Barbara | Born Here, But Not American?
Marc Blubaugh
Attorney; co-chair of Transportation and Logistics Practice Group at Benesch, Friedlander, Copland and Aronoff; Outside General Counsel to the Transportation Intermediaries Association
Benesch, Friedlander, Copland and Aronoff; Transportation Intermediaries Association
Episode: Interview: Marc Blubaugh about Montgomery v. Caribe | Can Car Crash Victims Sue Trucking Brokers?

Reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars from 20 ratings
  • Perfect for Law Buffs

    What a wonderful production! The previews and also summaries are so down to earth and accessible! Just brilliant! Thank you.

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    KW in Sydney
    Australia4 months ago
  • Narrator is tedious

    I really like the topic of the Supreme Court and wish this podcast was more listenable

    Apple Podcasts
    1
    Takoateli
    United States5 months ago
  • Refreshing and professional

    In addition to providing an easy way to listen to SCOTUS arguments, the hosts provide excellent and thoughtful analysis of the cases.

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Whowantsicecream
    United States7 months ago
  • Awesome Podcast!

    I’ve waited for years for a podcast to replay oral arguments, to synthesize opinions, and to provide ongoing Supreme Court coverage! Alas, this podcast arrived. I enjoy listening to the episodes and following the coverage. Keep it up!

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Momager321
    United States9 months ago
  • Best place for SCOTUS News!

    I love this quick and easy way to hear legal arguments and opinions on SCOTUS cases. This is the best podcast I have found. Thank You

    Apple Podcasts
    5
    Zerohat
    United States10 months ago

Listeners Say

Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.

Some listeners feel the narration pace can be tedious at times.
Strong organization and thorough notes make it easy to follow arguments.
Widely regarded as essential for anyone tracking SCOTUS developments.
Clear, accessible constitutional analysis with practical business implications.

Chart Rankings

How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.

Apple Podcasts
#96
United States/Government
Apple Podcasts
#203
United Kingdom/Government
Apple Podcasts
#234
Canada/Government
Apple Podcasts
#60
China/Government
Apple Podcasts
#62
Norway/Government
Apple Podcasts
#108
Philippines/Government

Talking Points

Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.

Oral Argument Re-Listen: Hamm v. Smith | SCOTUS Declines to Dig into IQ Score Showdown
Q: What is the proper role of multiple IQ scores in prong one?
The Court hears that multiple scores must be weighed holistically with adaptive functioning and other evidence; there is no per se rule that a single low score determines the outcome, and states may adopt reasonably reliable methods to handle multiple scores.
Oral Argument: Watson v. RNC | Can States Accept Mail-In Ballots After Election Day?
Q: Does the federal election day statute require submission to a state official by Election Day for ballots to be valid?
The advocate argues that finality depends on official receipt by the state, not merely delivery to a private carrier, making the receipt by an election official a key requirement.
Interview Re-Listen: How Adam Feldman Predicted the Trump Tariff Cases Ruling
Q: So what within the data you looked at made you lead to believe that the decision was coming down the pipe?
Key indicators include how long opinions tend to take after oral arguments, the expedited nature of this docket, and patterns in past cases showing that expedited decisions still produce lengthy opinions with multiple voices, which helped anticipate the timing.
Interview Re-Listen: How Adam Feldman Predicted the Trump Tariff Cases Ruling
Q: Now, Adam, a lot happened today, as we just mentioned. Trump tariff cases came out in 60 seconds. What most stands out to you from the Trump tariff cases decision?
The discussion highlighted the timing, the number of separate opinions, and the doctrinal debates, especially around the major questions doctrine, as key factors shaping the decision and its reception; Feldman emphasizes how the data aligns with the observed outcomes and predicts how the Court might handle similar cases in the future.
Oral Argument: Enbridge v. Nessel | Deadline Drama and Treaty Tensions
Q: What are the implications of this case on federal and state relations?
The implications involve whether the case should be tried in federal court, impacting federal jurisdiction and treaty obligations, versus treating it as a state matter that affects state law.

Audience Metrics

Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.

Listeners per Episode
Gender Skew
Location
Interests
Professions
Age Range
Household Income
Social Media Reach

Frequently Asked Questions About The High Court Report

What is The High Court Report about and what kind of topics does it cover?

A concise overview of high-level Supreme Court coverage focused on oral arguments, case previews, and decisive analyses. Episodes typically unpack First Amendment and constitutional questions, with attention to how decisions affect business, policy, and everyday life. The show prioritizes accessible explanations, practical implications for professionals, and a clear breakdown of legal reasoning, often including audio from the arguments and expert commentary from a practicing attorney. Noteworthy is the emphasis on sharp, jargon-free explanations and timely updates that help busy listeners track the Court's evolution across a broad range of civil, criminal, and administrative topics.

Where can I find podcast stats for The High Court Report?

Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for The High Court Report. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to The High Court Report and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.

How many listeners does The High Court Report get?

Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for The High Court Report, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.

What are the audience demographics for The High Court Report?

Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for The High Court Report, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.

How many subscribers and views does The High Court Report have?

To see how many followers or subscribers The High Court Report has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.

Which podcasts are similar to The High Court Report?

These podcasts share a similar audience with The High Court Report:

1. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
2. U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
3. We the People
4. Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
5. Divided Argument

How many episodes of The High Court Report are there?

The High Court Report launched a year ago and published 500 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.

How do I contact The High Court Report?

Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.

Where can I see ratings and reviews for The High Court Report?

Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for The High Court Report from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.

View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.

How do I access podcast episode transcripts for The High Court Report?

Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of The High Court Report. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.

What guests have appeared on The High Court Report?

Recent guests on The High Court Report include:

1. Adam Unikowsky
2. Daniel Geyser
3. Adam Feldman
4. Adeel Bashir
5. Mark Bluebaugh
6. John Durnell
7. John Sauer
8. Cecilia D. Wang

To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.

Find and pitch the right podcasts

We help savvy brands, marketers and PR professionals to find the right podcasts for any topic or niche. Get the data and contacts you need to pitch podcasts at scale and turn listeners into customers.
Try it free for 7 days