
Opening Arguments is a law show that helps you make sense of the news! Comedian Thomas Smith brings on legal analysts to help you understand not only current events, but also deeper legal concepts and areas! The typical schedule will be M-W-F with Monday being a deep-dive, Wednesday being Thomas Takes the Bar Exam and patron shoutouts, and Friday being a rapid response to legal issues in the news!... more
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 1262 | Founded | 10 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | PoliticsNews | |||

OA1280 - Peter O’Neil was preparing for retirement after decades of practicing law when he learned that he was autistic at the age of 65. This realization inspired his memoir My So-Called Disorder: Autism, Exploding Trucks, and the Big Daddy of Rock ... more
OA1279 - This week on Rapid Response Friday: A federal judge rips up the corrupt “settlement” Trump reached with his own IRS at the unprecedented request of a group of 35 former federal judges just in time time for aspiring Attorney General Todd Blan... more
VR38 - This week in Vapid Response Thomas, Lydia, and Matt review some truly awful takes from a MAGA economist on the true cause of low crime rates, Rep. Nancy Mace on her extremely real and not-at-all-racist concerns about the dangers of judges with... more
OA1278 - On its face, the decision in Watson is a pretty narrow ruling. Some states allow ballots postmarked on or before election day, but arriving after election day, to be counted. The court decided they can continue to do so.
But at stake was s... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





I'm a fan!
I know the anti-Irish comments are just jokes but you may be alienating part of your audience.
Also it would be great if the attorney could speak more loudly and clearly.
Thanks for keeping tabs on the U.S. legal system and explaining it so well.
I love everything about the show. It’s funny but it breaks things down so that way it’s easily digestible for people that don’t understand how convoluted and complicated legal terminology and procedures can be. Thomas ranting and being angry about something every episode makes me giggle and yet I completely identify with his anger and frustration and so it is all entirely relatable.
Very happy to see the return of OA and introduction of Matt. It is hard to overlook the difference in volume in voices, however...Matt speaks softly and Thomas's nasally, brash voice is irritating. To Thomas: love ya dude, but PLEASE speak about 50% less, and whenever you're about to go into one of your stream of consciousness things - just don't. It will save all the editing you do. And quit interrupting Lydia! She's way nicer to listen to and has lots of information to share.
It’s 3 ad breaks for an hour show. That’s absolutely normal or below normal. It’s almost like a bunch of people want to just lie about the show for some reason.
Ten minutes of adds, ten minute of l vacuous vamping and snark as an intro, and then another ad break? This has to be the least idea-rich podcast in the category. Congrats, folks.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #152 | |
Apple Podcasts | #196 | |
Apple Podcasts | #221 | |
Apple Podcasts | #20 | |
Apple Podcasts | #63 | |
Apple Podcasts | #91 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
A sharp, law-focused show that breaks down complex legal developments and current events with wit and accessible analysis. Episodes frequently blend courtroom concepts, constitutional debates, and high-profile cases with pop-culture references and humor, making intricate topics more digestible for a broad audience. Notable strengths include a dynamic host duo bolstered by legal analysts, a willingness to tackle timely political and policy questions, and a format that alternates between deep dives, rapid responses, and audience-driven segments. The show likely stands out for its energetic delivery, practical explanations of legal procedures, and punchy takes on contemporary issues, which can be appealing to legal professionals, policymakers,... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Opening Arguments. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Opening Arguments and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Opening Arguments, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Opening Arguments, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Opening Arguments has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Opening Arguments:
1. Where There's Woke
2. Law and Chaos
3. The Skepticrat
4. Dear Old Dads
5. Cognitive Dissonance
Opening Arguments launched 10 years ago and published 1262 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Opening Arguments from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Opening Arguments. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Opening Arguments include:
1. Peter Kanellis
2. Unspecified patrons/readers
3. Xavier de Janon
4. Peter Canellos
5. Sherise Doyley
6. Ian Crossland
7. Todd Blanche
8. Matthew Bergman
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.