
The podcast where we choose a subject, read a single Wikipedia article about it, and pretend we're experts. Because this is the internet, and that's how it works now.
| Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 502 | Founded | 9 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Listeners | Categories | Society & CultureComedy | |||

Grand Theft Auto (GTA) is an action-adventure video game series created by David Jones and Mike Dailly.[2] Later titles were developed under the oversight of brothers Dan and Sam Houser, Leslie Benzies and Aaron Garbut. It is primarily developed by B... more
Morris Berg (May 3, 1902 – May 29, 1972) was an American professional baseball catcher and coach in Major League Baseball who later served as a spy for the Office of Strategic Services during World War II. He played 15 seasons in the major leagues, a... more
Friedrich Wilhelm Heinrich Alexander von Humboldt{{cite web|url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/humboldt|title=Humboldt|work=[[Collins English Dictionary]]|publisher=[[HarperCollins]]|access-date=11 July 2019}} also {{IPAc-en|US|... more
People also subscribe to these shows.





I can only assume this podcast is mostly listened to by Americans which would 1) explain why it has any good reviews at all & 2) why the ‘humour’ is so horrifyingly poor. It’s not just puerile, it’s not even remotely funny. Think ‘Impractical Jokers’ after having a lobotomy & you’ll understand. Listened to approx 15 minutes then had to stop. HAD to stop. Truly awful.
Definitely my favorite podcast I've ever listened to. The guys are hilarious and it only gets better once you get to know the hosts' characters better
It’s a little bit too much like Beavis & Butthead. They are certain that they’re funny; if you’re not a frat boy, you will not find them funny. There’s no research, no deep dive, no citation; they read a Wikipedia article and make middle school jokes about it.
Sigh.
Fantastic!
This show is my favorite the guys are hilarious
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #159 | |
Apple Podcasts | #181 | |
Apple Podcasts | #214 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | |
|---|---|
| Gender Skew | |
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
The show mixes irreverent humor with deep dives into a wide range of pop-cultural and historical topics, from technology bubbles and media scandals to bizarre subcultures and notable historical figures. Episodes typically feature banter-heavy panel discussions, skepticism-driven takes, and generous sponsor reads, all delivered with a playful, irreverent tone. This combination tends to attract listeners who enjoy witty critique, offbeat history, and thought-provoking takes on contemporary myths, wealth, media, and technology. The format and guest mix often yield lively debates, surprising tidbits, and memorable punchlines that can work well for sponsorships seeking humorous, discussion-friendly podcasts with engaged, skeptical audiences.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Citation Needed. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Citation Needed and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Citation Needed, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Citation Needed, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Citation Needed has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Citation Needed:
1. The Skepticrat
2. The Scathing Atheist
3. God Awful Movies
4. Cognitive Dissonance
5. Dear Old Dads
Citation Needed launched 9 years ago and published 502 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Citation Needed from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Citation Needed. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.
Recent guests on Citation Needed include:
1. Michael Marshall
2. Eli Bosnick
3. Tom Cecil
4. Heath Enwright
To view more recent guests and their details, simply upgrade your Rephonic account. You'll also get access to a typical guest profile to help you decide if the show is worth pitching.