
1992: The year of big-butt anthems, achy-breaky hearts, and Madonna’s Sex book. The year that Boyz II Men and Whitney Houston shattered chart records, while U2 and TLC confronted the AIDS crisis head-on. The year that introduced us to grunge, G-funk, and… Right Said Fred. In this podcast, journalist Jason Lamphier (Entertainment Weekly) looks back at the major hits, one-hit wonders, shocking headl... more
| Publishes | Weekly | Episodes | 16 | Founded | 4 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | Music HistoryMusic CommentaryMusic | ||||

This exclusive podcast from Rolling Stone tells the stories behind the “500 Greatest Songs of All Time." Hosts Brittany Spanos and Rob Sheffield dissect Rolling Stone's iconic list and explore the magic and mythology behind the songs on this in-depth... more
After Queen singer Freddie Mercury’s death in the fall of 1991, musicians confronted the AIDS crisis head-on. The band’s remaining members and a star-studded lineup celebrated the frontman’s legacy at the Freddie Mercury Tribute Concert in spring 199... more
This week, we take a brief pit stop in our crazy ride through 1992 for something extra special: an intimate chat with Tori Amos, whose groundbreaking debut solo album, Little Earthquakes, paired pianos and guitars — and shook the music world to its c... more
A feel-good alternative to hard-edged gangsta rap, Arrested Development burst out of Atlanta bearing messages of peace, love, and unity. After their critically acclaimed 1992 debut album, 3 Years, 5 Months and 2 Days in the Life Of…, won them a Gramm... more
People also subscribe to these shows.

What a wonderful trip down 90s lane! Listening to Mr. Lamphier is like spending time with an old friend. Can’t wait for his next deep dive into another year of music magic.
I turned 16, in 1992. Was excited to relive some 90’s nostalgia, but sadly, this podcast won’t be facilitating my trip down memory lane.
One of my biggest pet peeves with certain podcast is when they repeat and regurgitate information already heard previously. Another is when the host chooses to insert their own flowery gibberish to add colour to the content.
This series is chock full of both.
Take the title of the series. Why then, does the host constantly feel the need to remind us it’s 19... more
I love this podcast. I was 13 years old in rural Michigan in 1992, sneaking to watch MTV when my mom wasn’t around. This podcast has been a time machine back to those days. I’ve learned so much about the true stories of these songs and about the cultural landscape then. Please keep the episodes coming.
In 1992 I was a nonEnglish speaking 17 year old skipping class to stay home learning English by watching MTV. I was also passionate about any hints of political commentary in the local and international world, coming from a country that would soon see not only a coup-de-etat but major guerrilla related incidents.
There are so many good things in documenting ability and well executed production aspects of this podcast but that’s because of the position of power the host has. Power and no integ... more
Loved listening to this and remembering all of the songs! How were they all in 92! Love the host and his commentary.
Do wish there was the original music included but it was fun to go back and watch the videos on YT!
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #154 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
| Social Media Reach | |||||
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Where Were You in '92?. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Where Were You in '92? and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Where Were You in '92?, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Where Were You in '92?, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Where Were You in '92? has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Where Were You in '92?:
Where Were You in '92? launched 4 years ago and published 16 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Where Were You in '92? from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Where Were You in '92?. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.