An intermittent examination of Terry Pratchett's Discworld book series from an academic perspective, hosted by Joshua Bulleid. Contact: unseenacademicalspod@gmail.com Support: patreon.com/unseenacademicals
Publishes | Infrequently | Episodes | 50 | Founded | 5 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | BooksArts |
The second episode examining Terry Pratchett's 1992's Discworld novel, Small Gods, examining the role of books and memory in fantasy fiction, comparisons to Gene Wolfe's Book of the New Sun sequence, contemplations of genre and what it means to be a ... more
The first episode on Terry Pratchett's thirteenth (and best) Discworld novel Small Gods (1992), looking at religious and folkloric depictions of tortoises, the idea that gods need belief to survive as a trope of fantasy literature through influential... more
The third and final episode tangentially related to Terry Pratchett's 1989 Discworld novel Pyramids, providing a crash course in Egyptian fantasy and science fiction—as in written by Egyptians, rather than simply about them. We go all the way back to... more
Tangential mini(ish) episode, inspired by Pyramids (1989), examining mummy fiction and Western representations of Egypt from their nineteenth-century literary origins through twentieth-century film renditions and ultimate assimilation by stupid sexy ... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
A measure of how this podcast leaps around Sir Terry’s writings, this pot plunges in close to the end of the series: we are treated to a description of how Pratchett portrays dwarves, but then says there’s several of the books that people need to read to understand the progress of this portrayal. As yet none of the other books have been covered, despite numerous digressions. Indeed where Sir Terry elegantly used foot notes, this podcast plunges down caves of unconnected, dense expositions.
As ... more
There are so many canonical errors here for both Pratchett and Tolkien, overlaying activist postmodernism in a highly inappropriate way. Canonical errors aren't severe, but they do detract from the presentation. For instance: when they note that the wizards had been in their present form since Sourcery, it was from Moving Pictures onward. The speakers insist on maintaining an analysis where they consider gender as exclusively performative, it can be but it isn't exclusively so. It's very obvious... more
There are so many canonical errors here for both Pratchett and Tolkien, overlaying activist postmodernism in a highly inappropriate way. Canonical errors aren't severe, but they do detract from the presentation. For instance: when they note that the wizards had been in their present form since Sourcery, it was from Moving Pictures onward. The speakers insist on maintaining an analysis where they consider gender as exclusively performative, it can be but it isn't exclusively so. It's very obvious... more
The episodes I listened to started well, but quickly degenerated into interminable, rambling digressions into everything else these over-attenuated English majors think about. Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to start with their least favorite book, then talk about it for two hours? They found the first podcast so taxing to record that they took a several-months break in the middle of recording it. Please let that fact sink in before you start listening because if it was that bad for... more
The episodes I listened to started well, but quickly degenerated into interminable, rambling digressions into everything else these over-attenuated English majors think about. Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to start with their least favorite book, then talk about it for two hours? They found the first podcast so taxing to record that they took a several-months break in the middle of recording it. Please let that fact sink in before you start listening because if it was that bad for... more
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #190 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
Social Media Reach |
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to this podcast and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for this podcast, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for this podcast, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers this podcast has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with this podcast:
1. Discworld Order
2. You're Dead to Me
3. The Infinite Monkey Cage
4. Friday Night Comedy from BBC Radio 4
5. No Such Thing As A Fish
this podcast launched 5 years ago and published 50 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for this podcast from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of this podcast. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.