Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please... more
Publishes | Monthly | Episodes | 431 | Founded | 11 years ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | ComedyGovernment |
The Supreme Court's term is over so it's time to panic. This week's episode covers Trump v. CASA, which doesn't really talk about birthright citizenship, but maybe does something even worse. This episode also covers Skrmetti v. US, which is maybe n... more
This week's question asks the age old question of whether we are dealing with a Constitutional Crisis, or run-of-the-mill incompetency. Brett and Nazim discuss the cases of Noam v. Garcia and Trump v. JGG to determine the scope of both Supreme Court... more
Brett and Nazim return to cover three Con Law cases. The first, Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, asks whether mandatory government ID verifications for adult websites violates the First Amendment. The second, Skrmetti v. US, discusses the applicati... more
This week's episode covers the Supreme Court's decision in TikTok v. Garland, a great example of how the Federal government passing laws can end up as the Federal Government's own worst nightmare. Nazim has returned, so enjoy commentary on snow days... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
I can’t believe I haven’t rated or reviewed yet! Great show!
Love this podcast I’ve been listening for a while now. I had Brett as a law professor he’s an awesome guy to talk to and incredibly knowledgeable thank you guys.
Love these dudes. When Brett says “Thomas, with a solo dissent...”
I was once a fan of this show but it’s basically turned into boilerplate liberal talking points. Yawn.
Like the title, great podcast with two guys having fun and talking about the Supreme Court.
Facebook group is great too.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #203 | |
Apple Podcasts | #205 |
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | |
---|---|
Location | |
Interests | |
Professions | |
Age Range | |
Household Income | |
Social Media Reach |
Two attorneys engage in entertaining discussions about contemporary Supreme Court cases, aiming to demystify the law for everyday listeners. The hosts share personal anecdotes, frequently weaving humor into their analyses, which helps make complex legal topics more relatable and approachable. They balance serious legal insights with lighthearted banter, creating a unique listening experience that appeals to both legal enthusiasts and the general public who appreciate a humorous take on current events and legal issues. Their discussions often diverge into personal stories, particularly relating to parenting and cultural references, making each episode feel personal and accessible.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court:
1. Strict Scrutiny
2. Pod Save America
3. Stuff You Should Know
4. The Fifth Column
5. Offline with Jon Favreau
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court launched 11 years ago and published 431 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.