
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please... more
| Publishes | Infrequently | Episodes | 433 | Founded | 11 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Comedy | ||||

This week's episode addresses three cases involving the government and the political process. This includes Trump v. Barbara (addressing the merits of birthright citizenship), Louisianna v. Callais (further undermining the Voting Rights Act), and Wat... more
Hi there. This week's episode covers a lot to make up for all the time we've been away. The episode starts with discussing LGBT rights (Little v. Hecox & Chiles v. Saalazar), then moves to the Second Amendment (Wolford v. Lopez & US v. Hemani) and co... more
The Supreme Court's term is over so it's time to panic. This week's episode covers Trump v. CASA, which doesn't really talk about birthright citizenship, but maybe does something even worse. This episode also covers Skrmetti v. US, which is maybe not... more
This week's question asks the age old question of whether we are dealing with a Constitutional Crisis, or run-of-the-mill incompetency. Brett and Nazim discuss the cases of Noam v. Garcia and Trump v. JGG to determine the scope of both Supreme Court ... more
People also subscribe to these shows.
Bendy please teach bar prep and also con law 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 love you thanks
I can’t believe I haven’t rated or reviewed yet! Great show!
Love this podcast I’ve been listening for a while now. I had Brett as a law professor he’s an awesome guy to talk to and incredibly knowledgeable thank you guys.
Love these dudes. When Brett says “Thomas, with a solo dissent...”
I was once a fan of this show but it’s basically turned into boilerplate liberal talking points. Yawn.
Key themes from listener reviews, highlighting what works and what could be improved about the show.










Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Gender Skew | |
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Interests | |
| Professions | |
| Age Range | |
| Household Income | |
| Social Media Reach |
Focused on making legal discussions accessible and entertaining, this podcast features two attorneys who share their frustrations and humor about the complexities of the law, especially surrounding current Supreme Court cases. The episodes blend serious legal examination with lighthearted discussions, covering a range of topics, including birthright citizenship, transgender rights, free speech, and the intersection of law with digital privacy issues. Unique to this podcast is the personal banter between the hosts, as they share anecdotes that resonate with the average listener, making it a blend of entertainment and education in the field of law.
Listeners can expect a mix of legal commentary sprinkled with the hosts' personalities, which ... more
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court:
1. Strict Scrutiny
2. The Daily
3. 5-4
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court launched 11 years ago and published 433 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.