
在一个插科打诨的时代,我想大声思考每一个严肃的人都会关心的问题。在一个价值序列混乱的时代,我好奇如何选择才能过完有意义的一生。在一个人与人、国与国充满敌意的时代,我试图用理智穿透扑朔迷离的政治乱象,触摸人性不变的底色。 这个播客叫做《独树不成林》,因为我只是一个单薄、偏颇的个体,我的视野必然被我的经历和视角局限,但我相信我的思想可以通过不断碰撞真理,发出一些嘹亮的回声,穿透个体的偏颇触摸超验的永恒。我相信通过日复一日的苦读前人智慧、反思现代困境,我的观察可以在中文语境创造一片激发不同声音、不同反省的树林,对世界保持好奇,对事实保持审慎,在这个脑满肠肥扑朔迷离的时代里寻找一个坚定、逻辑自洽的个人立场。 我现在是政治哲学博士候选人,在2所美国大学做政治哲学讲师。
| Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 379 | Founded | 3 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Number of Listeners | Categories | Society & CultureGovernment |

本期继续讨论莎士比亚的《科利奥兰纳斯》,重点放在它对普鲁塔克《科利奥兰纳斯传》的改编。莎士比亚参考并且使用了普鲁塔克写的大部分故事骨架,却在人物、场景和政治冲突上进行了持续改写。通过这些变化,可以更清楚地看到莎士比亚真正关心的问题。
如果上一期我们讨论的是《科利奥兰纳斯》中卓越与平等的冲突,那么这一期继续追问另一半:为什么真正看出科利奥兰纳斯危险性的,恰恰是那些最欣赏他、最理解他、也最希望他获得权力的罗马精英?梅尼纽斯、康米涅斯、元老院和沃伦妮娅都承认科利奥兰纳斯的卓越,也同样带着强烈的贵族偏见。但他们比科利奥兰纳斯更懂得政治生活的基本条件:英雄的功绩必须经过制度转化为权力,个人的骄傲必须受到礼仪和程序约束,面对同胞时也必须学会说服、退让和克制。梅尼纽斯用“肚腹与四肢”的寓言维持等级秩序,康米涅斯用军功证明科利奥兰纳斯确实配... more
本期播客重读莎士比亚的罗马悲剧《科利奥兰纳斯》。这部戏最核心的是两组关系:英雄与群众的关系,以及英雄与其他精英的关系。科利奥兰纳斯是罗马最卓越的战士,勇敢、自律、蔑视死亡,却极其不适合政治生活。他无法接受一个共和国最基本的事实:即使普通人没有他的勇气、才华和功绩,他们仍然有资格评价他、拒绝他,甚至放逐他。重点细读第二幕第三场。科利奥兰纳斯身上的“wounds”代表功绩,人民的“voices”代表政治承认。人民并不否认他的卓越,他们只是要求他承认普通公民也是值得被请求的人。与此同时,莎士比亚也没有... more
1766年,欧洲思想界发生了一场世纪大决裂的哲学家绝交事件。故事的两位主角,一位是素有“好人大卫”之称、温和克制、几乎从不与人撕破脸的大卫·休谟;另一位是已经名满欧洲,却因《爱弥儿》和《社会契约论》遭到通缉、四处流亡的让-雅克·卢梭。一开始,两人的关系几乎称得上如胶似漆。卢梭说,希望能够“在休谟身旁度过生命最后的时光”;休谟则把卢梭称为“现代的苏格拉底”,不仅亲自把他接到英国,还替他找房子、联系出版、争取国王年金,甚至表示自己一生都在努力效法卢梭高洁独立的为人。然而仅仅几个月以后,一封恶作剧式的... more
160期到哪里去了?
仲樹的第一個問題「如果荷馬是文明上升時代的吟遊詩人,那麼你是不是西方文明黃昏時代的吟遊詩人?」
這個問題令人感到十二萬分的驚艷~ 因為它不是通常娛樂記者可以問出的電影問題,而是一個定會令諾蘭亦認真思考並回答的、關於文明史的問題。仲樹她懂諾蘭,懂這個時代最偉大電影導演的創作母題……
篇幅有限,就不把所有感慨呈現於此,但對仲樹的由衷喜愛與欣賞必須表達。希望有機會能與仲樹更多交流,謝謝!
160期去哪儿了?
逻辑混乱,东一块西一块。也能感觉到主播膨胀了
这档节目最大的问题,是主播明明对左右采用完全不同的判断标准,却始终把自己包装成超越党派、穿透偏见的中立观察者。
把特朗普比作希特勒很无聊,在知识上很无趣;但把民主党定义成比共和党更加保守,把右翼对现有制度的颠覆能力包装成进步与改革,似乎就突然很有知识。民主党维护现有制度,只能说明它更加守成;右翼更善于砸掉现状,也只能说明它更加激进。一个执着于恢复传统家庭、宗教秩序、文化同质性和强总统的运动,不会因为砸东西比较积极,就自动变成进步力量。否则按照这套定义,复辟只要行动力够强,也算进步。
对左翼,她要求听众不要相信其关于平等、包容和权利的自我陈述,而要穿透表面善意,看到背后的权力欲、虚伪和制度渗透;对右翼,她却总愿意耐心区分Project 2025、万斯、特朗普和不同派系,恢复其最完整、最自洽、最值得理解的思想版本。左翼的善意需要被揭穿,右翼的恶意则需要被重新解释。
Project 2025尤其典型。她当初以十分确定、近乎内幕权威的姿态,强调Project 2025与特朗普之间的距离,明显低估了相关人员和政策进入政府的可能性。后来事实走向与判断相反,却没有看到她明确澄清:当初错在哪里,... more
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #222 | |
Apple Podcasts | #161 | |
Apple Podcasts | #231 | |
Apple Podcasts | #29 | |
Apple Podcasts | #50 | |
Apple Podcasts | #99 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Listeners per Episode | Gender Skew | Location | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interests | Professions | Age Range | |||
| Household Income | Social Media Reach | ||||
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for 独树不成林. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to 独树不成林 and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for four million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for 独树不成林, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for 独树不成林, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers 独树不成林 has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with 独树不成林:
独树不成林 launched 3 years ago and published 379 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for 独树不成林 from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of 独树不成林. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.