SCOTUS Intelligence” delivers sharp, AI-assisted analysis of the latest decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. With the help of Notebook LM, we don’t just summarize—we interrogate. We track shifts in doctrine, spotlight ideological undercurrents, and extract the quiet signals embedded in every concurrence and dissent. Perfect for lawyers, educators, and the legally curious, this podcast brings you... more
Publishes | Daily | Episodes | 23 | Founded | 4 months ago |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | NewsGovernmentPolitics |
This document presents a dissenting opinion from Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, regarding the Supreme Court's decision to grant a stay in the case of Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, et al. v. New York, et al.The core ... more
The provided text presents a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. American Federation of Government Employees, et al. The majority opinion grants a stayof a prel... more
A Notebook LM generated case review of a United State Supreme Court decision including opinion, the majority opinion, concurring opinion by Justice Thomas, and concurring opinion by Justice Jackson, that centers on a case where Catholic Charities Bur... more
A Notebook LM generated review of a 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion concerning a lawsuit brought by the Government of Mexico against several American gun manufacturers. The core issue revolves around the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms... more
A Notebook LM generated review of a United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, along with a concurring opinion. The Syllabus and Opinion of the Court address the "background circumstances" rule, whic... more
Notebook LM review of United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279, et al., decided in June 2025. This document, including the Syllabus and the Court's opinion delivered by Chi... more
The provided text consists of excerpts from a Supreme Court syllabus and opinion in the case of Martin v. United States, decided in 2025. The core of the case concerns the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), specifically addressing two points of law disp... more
A Notebook LM generated review of a June 2025 United States Supreme Court opinion and accompanying dissenting opinion address Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, a case concerning the jurisdiction of the United States Tax Court. The majority op... more
Recent interactions between the hosts and their guests.
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
Gender Skew | |
---|---|
Location | |
Interests | |
Professions | |
Age Range | |
Household Income | |
Social Media Reach |
This podcast provides insightful analysis of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, emphasizing not just the outcomes but also the doctrinal shifts and ideological currents underlying these rulings. Each episode examines key cases, unveiling the broader implications for American law and society while interpreting the subtleties in the justices' opinions. The content is particularly beneficial for legal professionals, educators, and those with a vested interest in the judiciary, offering a depth of analysis that goes beyond mere summaries. With its focus on critical thinking about the legal landscape, the podcast likely aims to inform and engage a knowledgeable audience interested in the workings of the highest court in the United States.
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for SCOTUS Intelligence. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to SCOTUS Intelligence and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for SCOTUS Intelligence, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for SCOTUS Intelligence, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers SCOTUS Intelligence has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with SCOTUS Intelligence:
SCOTUS Intelligence launched 4 months ago and published 23 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for SCOTUS Intelligence from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of SCOTUS Intelligence. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.