
A podcast about law, law school, legal theory, and other nerdy things that interest us.
| Publishes | Twice monthly | Episodes | 218 | Founded | 12 years ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | PhilosophySociety & CultureEducation | ||||

We discuss the morality of concurring and dissenting. And the usual nonsense.
Joe and Christian talk about the pandemic and, then, some nonsense.
We discuss the march on the Capitol and... all this.
In this holiday spectacular, we talk about small claims. In particular, would a court for small copyright claims be a good or bad thing? You can probably guess what we each say. In exploring this, we consider the nature of dogs, hunters, and children... more
Interesting research projects are discussed, but the podcast could use some editing to reduce the rambles. Please bring in scholars whose research is more doctrinal so that students can engage with the podcast too.
Never heard of this before. Like in ask President Bill Clinton, when he will be in ANP and he says it depends what you mean is is.
Now for another example is like your language you use in the government. Quite confusing and that you really look at what they’re really saying and read between the lines.
For another example, look at FinePrint the privacy laws like on Facebook. None of us read it because we don’t understand it.
Joe and Christian have shown me just how fun law can be. Law school has been something I’ve seriously contemplated, but after hearing these two go back and forth with their wonderful guests I went ahead and bought an LSAT textbook. They show that law is fun and dynamic, not dry and rigid. The day this show stops will be a sad day indeed
I pick up a lot of ideas and concepts from this show and the show notes.
Forget the ability to sympathize, the hosts can't even empathize with people who hold contrary political views (this might explain the small number of guests that disagree with the hosts). The grand standing (which after the 2016 election morphs into hysteria) becomes quite unbearable at times. For example, in one episode Mr. Turner compares anyone who believes in international borders to slave owners. His co-host, Mr. Miller, immediately endorses this view which is offensive to the vast majorit... more
How this podcast ranks in the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube charts.
Apple Podcasts | #208 |
Listeners, social reach, demographics and more for this podcast.
| Gender Skew | Location | Interests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professions | Age Range | Household Income | |||
| Social Media Reach | |||||
Rephonic provides a wide range of podcast stats for Oral Argument. We scanned the web and collated all of the information that we could find in our comprehensive podcast database. See how many people listen to Oral Argument and access YouTube viewership numbers, download stats, audience demographics, chart rankings, ratings, reviews and more.
Rephonic provides a full set of podcast information for three million podcasts, including the number of listeners. View further listenership figures for Oral Argument, including podcast download numbers and subscriber numbers, so you can make better decisions about which podcasts to sponsor or be a guest on. You will need to upgrade your account to access this premium data.
Rephonic provides comprehensive predictive audience data for Oral Argument, including gender skew, age, country, political leaning, income, professions, education level, and interests. You can access these listener demographics by upgrading your account.
To see how many followers or subscribers Oral Argument has on Spotify and other platforms such as Castbox and Podcast Addict, simply upgrade your account. You'll also find viewership figures for their YouTube channel if they have one.
These podcasts share a similar audience with Oral Argument:
Oral Argument launched 12 years ago and published 218 episodes to date. You can find more information about this podcast including rankings, audience demographics and engagement in our podcast database.
Our systems regularly scour the web to find email addresses and social media links for this podcast. We scanned the web and collated all of the contact information that we could find in our podcast database. But in the unlikely event that you can't find what you're looking for, our concierge service lets you request our research team to source better contacts for you.
Rephonic pulls ratings and reviews for Oral Argument from multiple sources, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, and Podcast Addict.
View all the reviews in one place instead of visiting each platform individually and use this information to decide if a show is worth pitching or not.
Rephonic provides full transcripts for episodes of Oral Argument. Search within each transcript for your keywords, whether they be topics, brands or people, and figure out if it's worth pitching as a guest or sponsor. You can even set-up alerts to get notified when your keywords are mentioned.